From: Hans F. N. <Han...@hi...> - 2005-07-10 08:50:41
|
* Hartmut Henkel <har...@gm...> [2005-07-10]: > On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Hans F. Nordhaug wrote: > > > * Hartmut Henkel <har...@gm...> [2005-07-09]: > > > > > > this i don't understand at all. The default hash_size in the web > > > code is 10000, and the hash_prime is 8501. And there is an early > > > check "if hash_prime>hash_size then bad:=5;" so how does it come to > > > the above error at all? Never seen such a small hash size. Somehow > > > the pdfetex must have been compiled with another hash_prime < 3500? > > > > Hartmut, where do you have these numbers from - they are plainly > > wrong. > > Hans, these are the actual values from the current pdfetex and tex > source code, nothing wrong with these. There is parameter hash_extra, > set by texmf.cnf, and only the sum (hash_size + hash_extra) is the large > value one (wrongly) refers to by "hash_size". OK, maybe you are right, but I'm still not convinced. (MiKTeX doesn't even use texmf.cnf.) Could you please point to the files at cvs.miktex.org where these numbers are used? Remember that MiKTeX is a Windows port of TeX and hence the web files aren't the definite source for information, but the C++ files are... Anyway, you do agree that talking about internal values is of no use to end-users that never see these values? Best regards, Hans |