From: William P. <wi...@sc...> - 2006-01-26 03:55:06
|
Steve Mushero wrote: > If we really must sync HO to branches, then I suggest one of the ideas > I put forth last year as the easiest and simplest approach. This is > essentially to sent snapshot data from branches to HO for each > client/account. This means EVERY update contains a client and account > record, perhaps with some history, but no transactions. Thus every > new update from a branch REPLACES existing data at HO, so it's no big > deal if a weekly or monthly update is lost or applied out of order. [...] > > Downside is no transactional data, but who needs that at HO? I think > the process is simple enough to manage with the available skills and > it would work very nicely. That sounds like a great compromise between shipping only the reports and trying to do bidirectional sync. It allows the home office some ability to do ad-hoc reporting, but still dodges the tricky parts about syncing. For eventual nightly updates, I'm sure we could find an on-disk format that allows us to use simple tools like diff and patch to minimize bandwidth usage. James, would that be sufficient for Grameen Koota? William |