From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2007-05-31 18:37:37
|
On 5/31/07, Christopher Barker <Chr...@no...> wrote: > John Hunter wrote: > > If we have a pure python wxagg implementation that supports blitting, > > eg your Just Work with 2.8 changes, let's not bother building the 2.6 > > extension code at all, > > I think this is the way to go. Even with 2.6, it's a pain to get MPL to > find the right libs, etc, if there is more than one version of wx on the > system (like OS-X). I actually wrote some code to version check and find > the right one, but I don't see the point with the changes Ken has made > for 2.8 > OK, I just turned of BUILD_WXAGG by default and committed this in setup.py: # build wxPython extension code to efficiently blit agg into wx. Only # needed for wxpython <2.8 if you plan on doing animations BUILD_WXAGG = 0 I made no changes to backend_wxagg.py because it looks like the use_accelator code will do the right thing if _wxagg.so is not present. I am not a wx user, so I leave it to the rest of you to confirm and or vet these changes. JDH |