From: HamletG <ha...@ha...> - 2006-12-20 19:48:58
|
Hi, Yes, good point. But for the time being, I have enough space on my web page and uses my own CVS server ... it just reduces the "management" overhead, since I can control everything easily on my own. For the plugin idea, I will let it to you guys ... I'm too new to make a comment on this ;-) BR, Michel Andrew Straw wrote: > John Hunter wrote: > >> That said, I would always be happy to include a (mostly) full featured >> backend for a format a large number of users want. Short of that, I >> think distributing it through another channel, or making a sandbox in >> the mpl distribution, >> > FWIW, Jeff Whitaker 's basemap and my mplsizer (wx-like sizer > implementation for mpl) live in the "toolkits" directory of the mpl > svubversion tree. I think that partially-implemented backends could also > happily live there. > > It's also feasible to allow runtime discovery of backends through the > use of setuptools' plugins (to name one route). I understand completely, > however, that there may be a resistance to adding a dependency on > setuptools. > > > |