|
From: Trevor P. <tr...@ir...> - 2004-07-02 21:00:44
|
>-----Original Message-----
>From: mat...@li...
>[mailto:mat...@li...]On Behalf Of
>Sebastian Haase
>[...]
>Hi Trevor,
>I just substituted like this
>
> if (ignore) {
> minx =3D 1e+308; //orig: std::numeric_limits<double>::max();
> maxx =3D 1e-308; //orig: std::numeric_limits<double>::min();
> }
>
>and didn't have any problem.=20
Thanks - looking at that snippet made me realize I was switched around - =
I was setting minx =3D DBL_MIN and maxx =3D DBL_MAX.
With that fixed, it works fine. =20
I agree this might be a good thing to change in CVS, since this is the =
only thing tripping up a clean compile with gcc 2.95.
Trevor
|