From: Trevor P. <tr...@ir...> - 2004-07-02 21:00:44
|
>-----Original Message----- >From: mat...@li... >[mailto:mat...@li...]On Behalf Of >Sebastian Haase >[...] >Hi Trevor, >I just substituted like this > > if (ignore) { > minx =3D 1e+308; //orig: std::numeric_limits<double>::max(); > maxx =3D 1e-308; //orig: std::numeric_limits<double>::min(); > } > >and didn't have any problem.=20 Thanks - looking at that snippet made me realize I was switched around - = I was setting minx =3D DBL_MIN and maxx =3D DBL_MAX. With that fixed, it works fine. =20 I agree this might be a good thing to change in CVS, since this is the = only thing tripping up a clean compile with gcc 2.95. Trevor |