|
From: Andre' Walker-L. <wal...@gm...> - 2012-12-18 16:18:39
|
>> Is this in reference to issue #1603? Are you advocating changing the >> solution? > > > > My only point was that the ongoing conversation should > not accept uncritically the assertion that r<0 is senseless. and I finally appreciate that criticism. From my perspective, I was happy to learn something new. I think it is clear to all on the list, that at first, this notion railed against my senses. Cheers, Andre |