|
From: Mark L. <bre...@ya...> - 2012-10-12 22:15:42
|
On 12/10/2012 20:38, Ethan Gutmann wrote: > > I'm a little confused by this attitude. I recognize that there are issues around dates, I've written a few date libraries myself to get around insane excel date issues (pop quiz for anyone at MS, was 1900 a leap year?) or just to simplify APIs for my own use. But do neither of you think that nanoseconds are important to scientists? I know of enough projects that work with pico (and a few with femto) seconds. Even though I often work with climate data covering ~100s of years and used to work with geologic data covering ~billions of years, I may start working with raw laser data for distance measurements where nanoseconds can be a pretty big deal. These data would be collected over a few years time, so a date utility that can handle that scale range would be useful. I guess I'll be writing my own date/time library again and hacking together some way of plotting data in a meaningful way in matplotlib. > > Don't get me wrong, matplotlib shouldn't have to reinvent the wheel here, but claiming that nobody could possibly care about 1e-12 seconds seems a little provincial. My apologies if that is not how the above statements were intended. > > regards, > Ethan > > I actually said "What percentage of computer users wants a delta of 1e-12? I suspect that the vast majority of users couldn't care two hoots about miniscule time deltas in a world where changing time zones can cause chaos...". How does this translate into "claiming that nobody could possibly care about 1e-12 seconds seems a little provincial"? -- Cheers. Mark Lawrence. |