|
From: Gökhan S. <gok...@gm...> - 2012-10-05 19:58:48
|
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Damon McDougall <dam...@gm...>wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Gökhan Sever <gok...@gm...> > wrote: > > Seeing mpl produced plots would be only 1 or 2 clicks away, plus this > would > > This is not true. A lot of articles are unavailable to certain > institutions due to a lack of subscription. A major sticking point. > > I was only thinking open-access journals, which open-source users (i.e. users of python tools) tend to publish their articles in open-journals. Of course, there are subscription required articles but those are secondary concerns. Sometimes authors make their articles publicly available even the article is on a paid journal. > > > > provide context to the use of plots rather that extracting figures and > > putting them separately (dealing with copyright issues and such) on an > > alternative gallery page. The figures you linked look shinny but not much > > practical use in my field. > > Point taken on the context argument. I'll take that. To resolve it, > make the figure/html image link to the underlying publication? > > Citation listing is easier for me, we can go both ways, a page listing only citations, another one a more experimental figure/citation if copyright issues can be resolved easily. In anyways, we will have to gather citations. Let's start doing that? -- Gökhan |