|
From: Nelle V. <nel...@gm...> - 2012-10-05 19:42:12
|
On 5 October 2012 21:23, Damon McDougall <dam...@gm...> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Gökhan Sever <gok...@gm...> > wrote: > > Seeing mpl produced plots would be only 1 or 2 clicks away, plus this > would > > This is not true. A lot of articles are unavailable to certain > institutions due to a lack of subscription. A major sticking point. > > Am I wrong in thinking that journals copyright the final product? > Thus, it would be up to the author(s) to decide whether or not to > 'donate' a figure for a gallery. > I think it depends on the journal, and on the agreement. I think in most journals you/your institute can pay to have your paper publicly available. I wouldn't be shocked if a requirement to be in the gallery would be to donate a figure. > > > provide context to the use of plots rather that extracting figures and > > putting them separately (dealing with copyright issues and such) on an > > alternative gallery page. The figures you linked look shinny but not much > > practical use in my field. > I was just showing an example of a gallery of published figures. It is much easier to go through a gallery, to quickly see what a library is capable of, than clicking on links to articles, that may often be of closed access. > > Point taken on the context argument. I'll take that. To resolve it, > make the figure/html image link to the underlying publication? > > > > -- > Damon McDougall > http://www.damon-is-a-geek.com > B2.39 > Mathematics Institute > University of Warwick > Coventry > West Midlands > CV4 7AL > United Kingdom > |