From: Ryan M. <rm...@gm...> - 2012-03-08 17:07:12
|
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:47 AM, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: > I prefer option 2 because this is fairly easy and avoids code redundancy. > It would take just a few lines of extra code to do this with the python > sequence protocol as inputs and python lists as return values. It would > take a bit more to support numpy arrays as input and output, and we should > get input from Michael about the desirability of making _path.cpp depend on > numpy. I don't see the harm, but I'd like to verify. > > In my opinion, a slower implementation in a nxutils.py compatibility module > is not a release stopper, even if it is undesirable. +1 Python 3 support is more important and, quite frankly, overdue--especially given how long it's been sitting in the tree. Ryan -- Ryan May Graduate Research Assistant School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma |