From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2012-03-07 18:39:36
|
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > I agree that the deprecation process should have been followed better. > However, I'm not sure what you mean by them being faster than their Pyhton > counterparts. Both functions in nxutils are replaced by functions in > _path.cpp, which are also written in C++ but are more complete and don't > have broken corner cases. They may be slightly slower because they have a > few more checks and handle Bezier curves, but they are not significantly > slower. > What about providing a python module nxutils in master (1.2) that has the same signature as the old nxutils extension code, calls the path functionality, and raises a deprecation warning with suggested a suggested code migration? And then remove it for 1.3 JDH |