From: Jae-Joon L. <lee...@gm...> - 2010-06-10 15:50:56
|
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Erik Tollerud <eri...@gm...> wrote: > Jae-Joon, your patch looks to be effectively the same except for > slightly different behavior when more than 3 points are present... but > that was what was originally intended - the numpoints-> scatterpoints > was a good catch! I'm not sure if I put those numbers in the first places (maybe not), yes, that was what was originally intended. And I'm inclined to leave it as is. I'll commit the change soon. Thanks again. -JJ |