From: Darren D. <dsd...@gm...> - 2010-05-23 11:41:59
|
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Peter Butterworth <bu...@gm...> wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Darren Dale <dsd...@gm...> wrote: >> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Peter Butterworth <bu...@gm...> wrote: >>> On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Darren Dale <dsd...@gm...> wrote: >>>> I don't think the demo is ready for inclusion. Clicking in the plot >>>> window to open the dialog conflicts with all the other functionality >>>> on the toolbar. >>> >>> Feel free to amend the example as needed. Clicking in the plot window >>> to open the dialog is obviously not required. >> >> In that case I don't see the point of the demo. > > It is useful to provide code showcasing the full functionnality and > allowing to test it quickly. That said I agree that it probably > doesn't make sense to have a separate file for this. > Should I move the test code back to if __name__ == "__main__": in > figureoptions.py removing the mouse click binding ? > >> >>>> Also, when I open the figure options dialog, the dialog window >>>> background is transparent instead of using the desktop default. Why is >>>> that? >>> >>> No idea. I haven't encountered this issue before. I use Python 2.6.5 + >>> PyQt 4.7.2 on Win32. >>> >>> Could you possibly narrow this down a bit ? Is it caused by new code >>> in figureoptions.py ? >> >> I have no idea, and I don't have enough time to dig into it. I'm sorry. > > Darren: your help is greatly appreciated. > Is the platform/config specific transparent background issue blocking > ? There is nothing in the figureoptions code that should cause this > IMO. I don't know if it is platform specific, although I tested on a 64-bit kubuntu lucid with qt-4.6.2. I'm not comfortable checking in changes that introduce problems I don't understand. Darren |