From: S. v. d. W. <st...@su...> - 2008-04-20 21:44:24
|
On 20/04/2008, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote: > I don't see any contour lines; I see only the boundaries between patches. > In other words, the plot looks the way I would expect it to. This is with > evince or gv on a linux machine. (Both fail when trying to blow up the plot > to 400%, but work at 200%.) Attached is the script that generates the contour plot I'm interested in. A PNG cropped from the PS onscreen is at http://mentat.za.net/refer/contour_zoom.png It's small, but the line should be clearly visible. > My sense is that there is an optical illusion effect making the boundaries > look somewhat line-like, but it doesn't sound like this is what you are > talking about, so I am baffled. Could be -- maybe an interpolation effect? Odd thing is that the lines are differently coloured. In fact, I can get *only* the lines to render by commenting out certain lines in contour.py. > Do you see the problem if you run contourf_demo.py and use the gui to > generate png, pdf, and ps files from figure 1? I still can't see any sign > of it anywhere. I see contour lines, as shown here: http://mentat.za.net/refer/contour_demo.png > Would you send a png file generated with and without your workaround, > please? That should get around any differences in postscript interpreters. They are here: http://mentat.za.net/refer/contours_without_patch.png http://mentat.za.net/refer/contours_with_patch.png > It sounds like you are seeing something fairly subtle that I am having a > hard time seeing, and that is new with the transforms branch. I don't want to waste your time further with this problem, so if you think the above png's look fine then I'll just use my workaround. It might be a problem very specific to my setup. Thanks for your time, Stéfan |