|
From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2007-02-05 22:23:18
|
On 2/5/07, Darren Dale <dd...@co...> wrote: > I respectfully disagree. The current behavior is consistent with other output > formats, such as png. If we want to support tight bounding boxes, maybe it > would be better to do so with a kwarg. I'm happy to be wrong (especially because then we don't have any work to do) but I don't see the tight bounding box as inconsistent with Agg's behavior. I agree that the *.ps output should be consistent with the Agg png behavior since neither make a claim to clip the image to the visible elements. But *.eps implies a bounding box, it might make sense to offer a bounding box that is reduced to the visible elements. I certainly don't feel strongly, nor do I think it would be terribly hard to do..... JDH |