From: Robert M. <rob...@gm...> - 2014-10-25 09:52:07
|
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:41 PM, P Richards <pa...@ma...> wrote: > Wouldn't you want to do this the other way around? > > On mantisbt.org for instance, it tends to target 1.3.x > > Then when an issue is resolved, have user target the actual (future) version > it's fixed in i.e. 1.3.0, and at that point update the Target version to the > value set for fixed in version. > > Or even, update the target version to null at the point fixed in version is > set. > > The 2nd case might make more sense - as the target version for bug would > technically cease to exist once a bug had been fixed in a version. > > Paul Hm, here's how I tend to do things, not sure if it applies to everyone but I've seen this done in practice: - target some bugs for the X release so they show up on the roadmap page - resolve bugs, set fixed_in_version to the X release so they show up on the changelog page - when version X is released, mass change all bugs to target the X+1 release This is also what I see when working with other trackers ( except other trackers don't have two fields ) - issues are targeted to versions and moved when the version is released. The changes I proposed support this workflow - but we need to make sure that we don't invalidate use cases such as the one you outlined above. Robert -- http://robert.muntea.nu/ |