From: Robert M. <rob...@gm...> - 2014-10-20 14:36:15
|
(Sorry for asking but not contributing to this fix, but .... ) do we need to wait for Paul's patches or can someone come up with a security fix? I think it's not reponsibile towards our users to wait for someone to produce a security fix for such a long time. Cheers, Robert On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:09 AM, P Richards <pa...@ma...> wrote: > Apparently your email address doesn't work correctly - at least (rather > amusingly) google isn't allowing a google user to email another google user: > > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > dr...@ma... > > Technical details of permanent failure: > Message rejected by Google Groups. Please visit > http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=188131 to review > our Bulk Email Senders Guidelines. > > ----- Original message ----- > > X-Received: by 10.180.85.102 with SMTP id g6mr8889617wiz.54.1413672671965; > Sat, 18 Oct 2014 05:51:11 -0700 (PDT) > Return-Path: <pa...@ma...> > Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com. > [209.85.212.175]) > by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id > r8si3539198wiy.73.2014.10.18.15.51.11 > for <dr...@ma...> > (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); > Sat, 18 Oct 2014 05:51:11 -0700 (PDT) > Received-SPF: none (google.com: pa...@ma... does not designate > permitted sender hosts) client-ip=209.85.212.175; > Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; > spf=neutral (google.com: pa...@ma... does not designate > permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=pa...@ma... > Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id d1so4483466wiv.14 > for <dr...@ma...>; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 05:51:11 -0700 (PDT) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Damien Regad [mailto:dr...@ma...] > Sent: 18 October 2014 23:23 > To: Man...@li... > Subject: [mantisbt-dev] 1.2.18 release > > Paul, > > As you know we have several open security issues including some fairly > critical ones. I have fixes ready to go for the most recent ones, and to > close the loop I want to release 1.2.18 as soon as possible. > > *I remind you that you owe us a series of security fixes since May*, and you > agreed earlier this week on IRC [1] to send them to me via e-mail by Friday. > > It is now late Saturday (early Sunday actually), and I still haven't > received anything from you. To be blunt: > > YOU ARE BLOCKING A SECURITY RELEASE > > This is really unprofressional. Please act responsibly, and put on hold some > of the trivialities you've been working on for the past few weeks/months for > the few minutes it will take to send me patches. And please don't give me > any of that shit again about your SSH access. > > Damien > > [1] > http://www.mantisbt.org/irclogs/mantisbt/2014/mantisbt.2014-10-15.log.html > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. > Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. > Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. > Take corrective actions from your mobile device. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. > Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. > Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. > Take corrective actions from your mobile device. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev -- http://robert.muntea.nu/ |