From: Jeferson O. <jef...@gm...> - 2009-09-23 19:43:37
|
Hi! After two weeks testing Mantis 1.2.0rc1, all the problems I found was solved. Some of them with help of the good souls that use to read these groups :D but most of them was already solved and reported in the bugtracker (last problem we detected was reported and solved here http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=10655). Accessing the "diff" content of the changed files, and applying the same changes to my local files, my problems went away and I am using this version in production in a team 20 users since the day before yesterday. No more problems so far. Thank you all who worked on those solutions! So I believe is time to 1.2.0rc2. If you need a brave team to test rc2 here we are! :-) -- Regards, Jeferson Oliveira Brazil |
From: Robert M. <rob...@gm...> - 2009-09-23 19:59:53
|
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Jeferson Oliveira <jef...@gm...> wrote: > Hi! > > So I believe is time to 1.2.0rc2. If you need a brave team to test rc2 > here we are! :-) I'm going to shamelessly assume this is a call for 'is Mantis stable enough for a RC' so here are my 2 cents: There are 3 regressions in the SOAP API which I've reported and/or bisected and attached at patches to which break important parts of the SOAP API. These cover data loss, inability to read attachments and inability to update issues. This makes the usage of e.g. the Mylyn connector for Eclipse close to impossible. Please look into 0010775: [regression] Unable to update issue using SOAP API http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=10775 which I bisected and with giallu's help managed to attach a partial patch 0010776: Retrieving an attachment with the SOAP API fails due to SYSTEM NOTICE http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=10776 patch attached 0010845: mc_issue_update erases Additional info and steps to reproduce http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=10845 patch attached I really look forward to introducing Mantis 1.2 to my organisation, but I'd appreciate a stable SOAP API. Thanks, Robert |
From: Thomas C. <tw...@gm...> - 2009-09-23 20:05:35
|
All of the small patches I've submitted ended up being for not, as they where all fixed in trunk, and then backported. I totally second the idea of releasing a new 1.2 RC, if not the real 1.2. Thomas On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Robert Munteanu <rob...@gm...> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Jeferson Oliveira > <jef...@gm...> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> So I believe is time to 1.2.0rc2. If you need a brave team to test rc2 >> here we are! :-) > > I'm going to shamelessly assume this is a call for 'is Mantis stable > enough for a RC' so here are my 2 cents: > > There are 3 regressions in the SOAP API which I've reported and/or > bisected and attached at patches to which break important parts of the > SOAP API. These cover data loss, inability to read attachments and > inability to update issues. This makes the usage of e.g. the Mylyn > connector for Eclipse close to impossible. > > Please look into > > 0010775: [regression] Unable to update issue using SOAP API > http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=10775 > > which I bisected and with giallu's help managed to attach a partial patch > > 0010776: Retrieving an attachment with the SOAP API fails due to SYSTEM NOTICE > http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=10776 > > patch attached > > 0010845: mc_issue_update erases Additional info and steps to reproduce > http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=10845 > > patch attached > > > I really look forward to introducing Mantis 1.2 to my organisation, > but I'd appreciate a stable SOAP API. > > Thanks, > > Robert > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev > -- -- Thomas |
From: David H. <hic...@op...> - 2009-09-25 07:36:36
|
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 16:05 -0400, Thomas Charron wrote: > I totally second the idea of releasing a new 1.2 RC, > if not the real 1.2. We still have a bunch of bugs remaining on the roadmap for 1.2.x: http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/roadmap_page.php Any assistance is welcomed :) While I certainly think we're getting close to something that could be considered stable, there do remain a few things that need fixing. I've never really seen the need for beta/RC builds as it is easier for testers to just track the latest 1.2.x branch using git. However if tagging an RC2 release would lead to 1.2.x getting more testing before the stable release, I'm all for it. Regards, David |
From: David H. <hic...@op...> - 2009-09-25 07:24:20
|
I agree that those SOAP API bugs are holding back the next release. I don't use SOAP or know much about how to test it, so there is little I can assist with here. If anyone has the time, creation of some unit tests for the SOAP functionality would be a *great* assistance. Are any devs with commit access (and an ability to use SOAP) able to check these patches over? Regards, David On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 22:59 +0300, Robert Munteanu wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Jeferson Oliveira > <jef...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > So I believe is time to 1.2.0rc2. If you need a brave team to test rc2 > > here we are! :-) > > I'm going to shamelessly assume this is a call for 'is Mantis stable > enough for a RC' so here are my 2 cents: > > There are 3 regressions in the SOAP API which I've reported and/or > bisected and attached at patches to which break important parts of the > SOAP API. These cover data loss, inability to read attachments and > inability to update issues. This makes the usage of e.g. the Mylyn > connector for Eclipse close to impossible. > > Please look into > > 0010775: [regression] Unable to update issue using SOAP API > http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=10775 > > which I bisected and with giallu's help managed to attach a partial patch > > 0010776: Retrieving an attachment with the SOAP API fails due to SYSTEM NOTICE > http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=10776 > > patch attached > > 0010845: mc_issue_update erases Additional info and steps to reproduce > http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=10845 > > patch attached > > > I really look forward to introducing Mantis 1.2 to my organisation, > but I'd appreciate a stable SOAP API. > > Thanks, > > Robert > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev |
From: Robert M. <rob...@gm...> - 2009-09-25 08:01:20
|
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:24 AM, David Hicks <hic...@op...> wrote: > I agree that those SOAP API bugs are holding back the next release. I > don't use SOAP or know much about how to test it, so there is little I > can assist with here. If anyone has the time, creation of some unit > tests for the SOAP functionality would be a *great* assistance. If anyone would like to have an active 'testing session', where I apply and test proposed fixes for the SOAP API I'd be happy to take part starting Monday next week. I'm in the EEST time zone FWIW. As for the unit testing part, I know there are some tests in tests/soap but I don't (yet) know how to run them - my PHP is nowhere near what it used to be. Still, given: - some documentation on how to run them, i.e. on what state the database should contain initially and how to invoke the tests - access to a CI server like Hudson ( which is dead-easy to set up and not at all resource-consumimg ) I would be able to set up a CI job which runs those tests after each commit. I've done before with Git and Java, but I know PHP jobs work just as fine with Hudson. Robert > > Are any devs with commit access (and an ability to use SOAP) able to > check these patches over? > > Regards, > > David > > > On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 22:59 +0300, Robert Munteanu wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Jeferson Oliveira >> <jef...@gm...> wrote: >> > Hi! >> > >> > So I believe is time to 1.2.0rc2. If you need a brave team to test rc2 >> > here we are! :-) >> >> I'm going to shamelessly assume this is a call for 'is Mantis stable >> enough for a RC' so here are my 2 cents: >> >> There are 3 regressions in the SOAP API which I've reported and/or >> bisected and attached at patches to which break important parts of the >> SOAP API. These cover data loss, inability to read attachments and >> inability to update issues. This makes the usage of e.g. the Mylyn >> connector for Eclipse close to impossible. >> >> Please look into >> >> 0010775: [regression] Unable to update issue using SOAP API >> http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=10775 >> >> which I bisected and with giallu's help managed to attach a partial patch >> >> 0010776: Retrieving an attachment with the SOAP API fails due to SYSTEM NOTICE >> http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=10776 >> >> patch attached >> >> 0010845: mc_issue_update erases Additional info and steps to reproduce >> http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=10845 >> >> patch attached >> >> >> I really look forward to introducing Mantis 1.2 to my organisation, >> but I'd appreciate a stable SOAP API. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Robert >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA >> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your >> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay >> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf >> _______________________________________________ >> mantisbt-dev mailing list >> man...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev > |
From: Gianluca S. <gi...@gm...> - 2009-09-25 08:18:06
|
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:24 AM, David Hicks <hic...@op...> wrote: > I agree that those SOAP API bugs are holding back the next release. I > don't use SOAP or know much about how to test it, so there is little I > can assist with here. If anyone has the time, creation of some unit > tests for the SOAP functionality would be a *great* assistance. We actually have some unit tests for the SOAP api, and most of them broke with the merge of the bugObject branch... -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna |