Re: [Linwizard-devel] Fwd: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] 32k timer patches

[Christopher F. <chr...@gm...>]

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Angelo Arrifano <mi...@gm...> wrote:
> AFAIK 32k is mostly important for suspend.

Wasn't the 32k also necessary for dynamic ticks? I can't remember
exactly ... I just finished 2 of my last 3 exams (phew!) and should
finally have a bit of time to hack at the linwizard kernel a bit more.

I remember working on one thing in particular (a few months ago, can't
remember right now) that was available on omap2, and theoretically
also on omap1, but it relied on the 32k clock, and I couldn't get it
to work properly before. It should be interesting to get back into my
kernel tree and see if these patches fix my problem (whatever it
was...).