You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(30) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(63) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(28) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(70) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(13) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-09-01 16:52:07
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2739655 By: nobody Hola, estoy traduciendo junto a otro chico el FAQ al castellano. En realidad está traducido ya pero hay un concepto que se nos resiste: wrapper Yo no soy ningún experto en linux así que muchas de las cosas las he traducido sin tener muy claro lo que estoy escribiendo. Si alguien sabe lo que significa que me escriba a ca...@ya... Muchas gracias y saludos. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-31 07:55:09
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2736944 By: szaka > du sees it as the 2gb file, but ls and x see it as 21gb. whats up with > that? It's a sparse file. A file is sparse if it has unallocated blocks (holes). The reported size of such files are always higher than the disk space consumed by them. The du command can tell the real disk space used by a sparse file. The holes are always read as zeros. All major Linux and Unix filesystem like, ext2, ext3, reiserfs, Reiser4, JFS and XFS, supports sparse files but for example the ISO 9600 CD-ROM filesystem doesn't. > will this cause problems when i try to put it on a dvdr? It depends how you write it. E.g. Iso9660 doesn't support sparse files so it would cause problem. > i guess i could try compessing it first that might make it relize its > only 2gb. let me know what you think. Yes, quite probably you must compress it. But use the method what's written in the manual: Space and speed-wise the most efficient way to compress a clone image tar -cjSf ntfs.img.tar.bz2 ntfs.img Uncompressing a tar archived clone image tar -xjSf ntfs.img.tar.bz2 You can use gzip too of course ('z' option for tar), that's usually much faster but the outputs are a bit bigger. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-29 20:46:07
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2734953 By: nobody the os is freebsd. i set up a nfs on another bsd computer and it seem to do ok. du sees it as the 2gb file, but ls and x see it as 21gb. whats up with that? will this cause problems when i try to put it on a dvdr? i guess i could try compessing it first that might make it relize its only 2gb. let me know what you think. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-29 09:31:43
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2734528 By: szaka > the nfs filesystem is ufs. Oh, so it's not Linux? What OS? > i did get one error/message when the client mounted the nfs "mount > version older than kernel" Your mount package is older then the kernel. > but everything seemed to work ok, i did a test write and access, but > things did seem a bit slow to me. and when i check the nfs disk on the > server it says the backup.img file is around that 20gb size but doesnt > take up that space on the drive or anything. You you did a plain 'ntfsclone -o /mnt/backup.img /dev/hda1' then that's the expected. 'ls' shows the file size, and 'du' shows the allocated space on the disk. > thats why i thought it was crapping out for the reason of not enough > space. the nfs is on my laptop and going through wireless network btw > - not that it should matter. Well, wireless network might do matter. Usually they are slower and can have reliability issues. Transfer depends on many factors. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-28 23:01:27
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2734272 By: nobody the nfs filesystem is ufs. i did get one error/message when the client mounted the nfs "mount version older than kernel" but everything seemed to work ok, i did a test write and access, but things did seem a bit slow to me. and when i check the nfs disk on the server it says the backup.img file is around that 20gb size but doesnt take up that space on the drive or anything. thats why i thought it was crapping out for the reason of not enough space. the nfs is on my laptop and going through wireless network btw - not that it should matter. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-28 22:59:16
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2734270 By: nobody the nfs filesystem is ufs. i did get one error/message when the client mounted the nfs "mount version older than kernel" but everything seemed to work ok, i did a test write and access, but things did seem a bit slow to me. and when i check the nfs disk on the server it says the backup.img file is around that 20gb size but doesnt take up that space on the drive or anything. thats why i thought it was crapping out for the reason of not enough space. the nfs is on my laptop and going through wireless network btw - not that it should matter. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-28 11:29:46
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2733795 By: szaka If you use a Unix filesystem on the NFS server then it should be 2.5 GB. What't the filesystem on the NFS server? One workaround from 'man ntfsclone' but the image will be bigger (maybe 3 GB?): backup: ntfsclone --output - /dev/hda1 | gzip -c > ntfs.img.gz restore: gunzip -c ntfs.img.gz | dd of=/dev/hda1 bs=8192 Make sure the backup doesn't report any error. Bzip2 can compress better but usually it's much slower. Restoring the image will be also slower but this is solved in the current ntfsclone development version by using a much more efficient image format. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-28 10:55:51
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2733785 By: nobody i need help creating an ntfsclone image over an NFS mount for ghostlike purposes. im using a CRK 2.67 boot disk and i get everything set up how i think it should be - network setup, ntfs tools installed, and nfs mounted and tested (on /mnt for discussion purposes). but when i go to make the image with "ntfsclone --output /mnt/backup.img /dev/hda1" and then does its analysing and what have you, but when im guessing is writing the image it says: "nfs: server address not responding, still trying" x3 and it just hangs there. now the drive is 20gb with about 2.5gb used, this should create and image around 2.5gb right? if not that might be the problem cause the nfs is only 12gb. any help would be appreciated, or maybe a suggestion of a different way to go. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-27 07:48:16
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2732247 By: uvman Hi, The 2.4 kernel series containes an obsolute driver. That driver does not allow loopback mounting. You probably had your 2.4.21 kernel patched with a backport of the driver used in the 2.6 kernels, and when you updated to 2.4.26, you did not patch it again. You can download the patch from the Files section. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-27 01:11:42
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2731913 By: nobody Dear friends, When I upgraded my kernel to 2.4.26, the ntfs driver (supplied together with the kernel) stopped working properly with my loopback device. I use a large file (about 400MB) inside a NT fs to read some part of my directory structure, like /usr and /lib, and other parts a read from the net. With 2.4.21 everything were working ok. I see that some changes were made in the code, since now the text "NTFS: Warning! NTFS volume version is Win2k+: Mounting read-only" appears while starting. I'd like to know if someone had the same problem and if there is a known solution. Thank you. []'s cassio. PS: 2.4.27 has the same behaviour as 2.4.26. I didn't try from 2.4.22 to 25. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-23 12:57:46
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2725047 By: flatcap Hi, This is a problem that Fedora introduced. The kernel config files in the sourcecode and binary rpms differ. David Lowe updated the build script to work around the problem. It now requires the kernel binary rpm (which you already have) in the current directory. Then run the build script as you did before and the new module should work without the oops. Cheers, FlatCap (Rich) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-23 12:57:44
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2725046 By: flatcap Hi, This is a problem that Fedora introduced. The kernel config files in the sourcecode and binary rpms differ. David Lowe updated the build script to work around the problem. It now requires the kernel binary rpm (which you already have) in the current directory. Then run the build script as you did before and the new module should work without the oops. Cheers, FlatCap (Rich) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-21 15:02:48
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2723305 By: nobody Built rpm's size is under 100KB. The error message is same as http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1122411&forum_id=44085 ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-21 11:11:44
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2723158 By: uvman Can you specify what was the error message? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-21 02:36:10
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2722928 By: nobody I cannot build right NTFS rpms by using http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/rpm/build.html #I tried 2.6.7-1.494.2.2 and 2.6.8-1.521 ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-20 01:25:47
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2721348 By: nobody That worked great! ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-19 16:51:54
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2720746 By: flatcap Hi Arthur, You have to be root to install an rpm. Either login, or run "su -" and type the root password. Cheers, FlatCap (Rich) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-19 02:20:50
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2719591 By: nobody I'm pretty new to Linux, so this might be a stupid question, but when I run the command: rpm -i kernel-ntfs-2.6.7-1.494.2.2.i686.rpm I get the message: error: can't create transaction lock Does anyone know what this means? Thanks a lot. -Arthur ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-14 03:58:55
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2712726 By: nobody Konqueror craches when I browse the root folder. /Win_Driver works fine. Also xmms crashes. Anyone help? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2004-08-11 20:59:40
|
Hi, On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, BrokenClock wrote: > I'm new user of the NTFS tools. I use it from the SystemRescueCD > (http://www.sysresccd.org), a Cd bootable linux distro build to repair a > unbootable Windows install. > I have a damaged disk. I have many problems with it: > *it seems the bios cannot recognized it, That sounds like your disk is broken. > *it cannot be used to boot, > *I cannot mount it in Linux... > > Listing the available commands in SystemRescue, I tried some and in > particular ntfsfix. I did not know yet that it was only to force Windows > to check the partition on boot. > I extract some interessant results (I think) : > many times, I had for many sectors: > > > read-intr: status=0x59 {DriveReady SeekComplete Data Request Error} > read-intr: error=0x40 {uncorrectable Error} > end request: I/O error Yes, your disk is indeed broken. The only way to recover data is to give it to a data recovery company. You could try to recover at least some files yourself but I am not aware of any software that will do it for you. I am afraid I do not have enough time to walk you through it (unless you are willing to pay for my time... (-;). > I regretfully have seen, on your web site, that ntfschk was not realised > yet. ntfschk would not help you in the slightest as your disk is broken or at least has bad sectors in important places but considering your bios doesn't even see it, it is more likely to be more complicated than just a few broken sectors. I would suggest to download and run the Drive Fitness Test from IBM website and check your disk with it. It will tell you what is wrong with it. Anyway, you have backups, right? Just get a new disk and recover them... Sorry not to be able to be of more help. Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-11 17:49:36
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2708489 By: flatcap I build all the NTFS RPMs from the kernel-sourcecode RPM. The config files in that RPM were different to the configs that were actually used to build the binary kernel RPMs. The clash caused the oops. Cheers, FlatCap (Rich) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-11 17:37:07
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2708469 By: djf_jeff Ok, I read that you fix the prob. Good! Is there a place that I can find what was the problem and how it was resolved? Thanx ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-11 01:45:11
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2707194 By: rosensama I've had a working 2.6.7-gentoo-r11 kernel. I have my root on a SCSI disk, /dev/sda3. Today, I added LDM to my kernel to be able to mount W2K dynamic partitions on newly added IDE disks /dev/hda and /dev/hdb. The IDE drives are fine and I see them with partition type SFS (as I believe I should) within fdisk before I enable LDM. After enabling LDM, when the IDE disks are recognized, I see extra messages: ldm_validate_partition_table(): Found W2K dynamic disk partition types However, I now get the message: VFS: Cannot open root device "sda3" or sda3 Please append a correct "root=" boot option Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on sda3. Above I see my SCSI driver correctly finding the sda disk as normal, but followed by an error message SCSI device sda: 35566499 512-byte hdwr sectors (18210MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: unknown partition table Any ideas how to get my LDM disks working with my existing disk? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-09 22:08:56
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2705229 By: nobody Same problem here as well. I am booting with the older version to get NTFS access. Any solution in the near future? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: BrokenClock <bro...@fr...> - 2004-08-09 15:04:44
|
Hello folks! I'm new user of the NTFS tools. I use it from the SystemRescueCD (http://www.sysresccd.org), a Cd bootable linux distro build to repair a unbootable Windows install. I have a damaged disk. I have many problems with it: *it seems the bios cannot recognized it, *it cannot be used to boot, *I cannot mount it in Linux... Listing the available commands in SystemRescue, I tried some and in particular ntfsfix. I did not know yet that it was only to force Windows to check the partition on boot. I extract some interessant results (I think) : many times, I had for many sectors: > read-intr: status=0x59 {DriveReady SeekComplete Data Request Error} read-intr: error=0x40 {uncorrectable Error} end request: I/O error > and at the end: > mounting volume FAILED Attempting to correct error... Processinf $MFT and $MFTMirr Reading $MFT... OK Reading $MFTMirr... FAILED > I regretfully have seen, on your web site, that ntfschk was not realised yet. Can anyone out there help me to solve this issue? I would like to copy my data elsewhere before change of disk. Many thanks, Stephane Mourey |
