You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(30) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(63) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(28) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(70) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(13) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-08 14:11:46
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2703035 By: szaka This is already supported for a while, use e.g. the latest ntfsprogs. Just ntfsclone then run 'ntfsresize device'. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-08 09:20:14
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2702897 By: nobody Well, I recompiled the kernel with NTFS support right into the kernel instead. The rpm seems to be broken (63kb compared to almost 800 on every other). ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-07 17:29:40
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2702406 By: astrophobos same for me with a smp kernel ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-06 23:40:13
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2701813 By: nobody Hi, I have the same problem as above. I have compiled the ntfs module with the "build 2.6" script but still got the same error. Found this link in bugzilla that might be of some interest: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129157 /Joakim ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-06 23:35:19
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2701808 By: nobody Hi, I have the same problem as above, I have also compiled the NTFS drivers with the "build 2.6" script, but still got the same error (had to slightly modify the script to make it work). I haven't used Linux long enough to be able to recompile the kernel, so I guess that someone else might want to try that. Found this link in bugzilla about this problem that perhaps can be of some interest: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129157 /Joakim ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-06 23:32:46
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2701805 By: nobody yes same problem with me ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-06 17:28:46
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2701327 By: nobody I have been using these modules for time now with no problems whatsoever unitil this last kernel 2.6.7-1.494.2.2 . I can install the NTFS rpm but if I modprobe the module I get the output below. However if I go back to the last kernel 2.6.6-1.435.2.3 all is fine. This is fedora core 2 system. Any suggestions please, Aug 6 13:13:16 beta kernel: NTFS driver 2.1.15 [Flags: R/W MODULE]. Aug 6 13:14:17 beta kernel: NTFS driver 2.1.15 [Flags: R/W MODULE]. Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: NTFS-fs warning (device Ã@1Ã): ntfs_fill_super(): Atime updates are not implemented yet. Disabling them. Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 40000050 Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: printing eip: Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: d8b16363 Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: *pde = 00000000 Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: Oops: 0000 [#1] Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: Modules linked in: nls_utf8 ntfs(U) nfsd exportfs lockd ipv6 parport_pc lp parport autofs4 sunrpc ipt_ttl ipt_TCPMSS ip_nat_irc ip_nat_ftp ipt_limit ipt_state iptable_mangle ipt_LOG ipt_MASQUERADE ipt_TOS ipt_REDIRECT iptable_nat ipt_REJECT ip_conntrack_irc ip_conntrack_ftp ip_conntrack iptable_filter ip_tables tulip floppy sg dm_mod usb_storage uhci_hcd ohci_hcd button battery asus_acpi ac ext3 jbd aic7xxx sd_mod scsi_mod Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: CPU: 0 Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: EIP: 0060:[<d8b16363>] Not tainted Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: EFLAGS: 00010202 (2.6.7-1.494.2.2) Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: EIP is at ntfs_fill_super+0x169/0x677 [ntfs] Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: eax: 40000000 ebx: d77c0ec0 ecx: c0319eb4 edx: d77c0ec0 Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: esi: 00000000 edi: d77c0f94 ebp: d1c3cc00 esp: d1c02e8c Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: Process mount (pid: 4224, threadinfo=d1c02000 task=d22ae190) Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: Stack: c03187c8 00000000 cf314000 d5e9b7b4 d1c3cc00 d5e9b780 00000000 c0169ac4 Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: 31616468 00000000 00000041 cec08000 fffffff4 cec08efc d8b21040 00000000 Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: c0357620 00000000 d7f6cec0 d8b21040 d8b16890 cf314000 d8b161fa c0169c89 Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: Call Trace: Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: [<c0169ac4>] get_sb_bdev+0xdf/0x11b Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: [<d8b16890>] ntfs_get_sb+0xe/0x11 [ntfs] Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: [<d8b161fa>] ntfs_fill_super+0x0/0x677 [ntfs] Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: [<c0169c89>] do_kern_mount+0x8a/0x13a Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: [<c018538f>] do_new_mount+0x61/0x90 Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: [<c0185f01>] do_mount+0x166/0x17e Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: [<c0144344>] __alloc_pages+0x2b5/0x2bf Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: [<c01863de>] sys_mount+0x121/0x1f9 Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: [<c02fe0f7>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Aug 6 13:14:33 beta kernel: Code: 8b 40 50 8b 40 34 85 c0 74 2b 66 8b 80 9e 01 00 00 66 85 c0 ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-06 17:19:31
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2701314 By: mitchinomaha Will ntfsclone permit restoring an NTFS image to a partition that is not the same size as the original source? Example: My hard drive crashes, and is replaced with a larger drive than I had before. Can I restore my saved NTFS image to the larger drive with a larger partition than the partition the image was created from? -- mitch ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-06 16:20:42
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2701258 By: antona The only thing I can think off is that the module is compiled with the wrong compiler or that fedora core 2 has introduced patches that make ntfs incompatible with it. At least the oops doesn't seem to make sense otherwise. Could one of you compile the ntfs module and preferably the whole kernel themselves on their fedora core 2 and see if it then works? Otherwise I would need the .s file from fs/ntfs/super.c to find out where exactly it is oopsing to diagnose this further. Best regards, Anton ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-06 16:20:06
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2701257 By: antona The only thing I can think off is that the module is compiled with the wrong compiler or that fedora core 2 has introduced patches that make ntfs incompatible with it. At least the oops doesn't seem to make sense otherwise. Could one of you compile the ntfs module and preferably the whole kernel themselves on their fedora core 2 and see if it then works? Otherwise I would need the .s file from fs/ntfs/super.c to find out where exactly it is oopsing to diagnose this further. Best regards, Anton ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-06 14:19:33
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2701066 By: nobody Hi All, I just updated to the latest kernel and so I updated the ntfs module. Since then, mounting ntfs partition goes in SEGFAULT with these errors in dmesg: NTFS driver 2.1.15 [Flags: R/W MODULE]. NTFS driver 2.1.15 [Flags: R/W MODULE]. NTFS-fs warning (device h�): ntfs_fill_super(): Atime updates are not implemented yet. Disabling them. Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 40000050 printing eip: 22a8e3e9 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 ntfs(U) snd_ens1371 snd_rawmidi snd_seq_device snd_pcm snd_page_alloc snd_timer snd_ac97_codec gameport snd soundcore via686a eeprom lm80 i2c_sensor i2c_isa i2c_viapro i2c_core parport_pc lp parport autofs4 tulip floppy sg nvidia(U) dm_mod usbnet mii uhci_hcd button battery asus_acpi ac ext3 jbd aic7xxx sd_mod scsi_mod CPU: 0 EIP: 0060:[<22a8e3e9>] Tainted: P EFLAGS: 00210202 (2.6.7-1.494.2.2) EIP is at ntfs_fill_super+0x169/0x677 [ntfs] eax: 40000000 ebx: 215368c0 ecx: 02312ef6 edx: 215368c0 esi: 00000000 edi: 21536994 ebp: 15616c00 esp: 0de28e8c ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 Process mount (pid: 2422, threadinfo=0de28000 task=079b2130) Stack: 0231181a 00000000 00000000 1730a0b4 15616c00 1730a080 00000000 02169087 31616468 00000000 21fef060 000000d0 0de28ec4 022f5da2 21f6dec0 00200246 068a5000 fffffff4 21f6dec0 22a990a0 22a8e916 00000000 22a8e280 0216924c Call Trace: [<02169087>] get_sb_bdev+0xdf/0x11b [<022f5da2>] __cond_resched+0x14/0x3b [<22a8e916>] ntfs_get_sb+0xe/0x11 [ntfs] [<22a8e280>] ntfs_fill_super+0x0/0x677 [ntfs] [<0216924c>] do_kern_mount+0x8a/0x13a [<021845d2>] do_new_mount+0x61/0x90 [<021850ff>] do_mount+0x176/0x18e [<0215e37e>] get_user_size+0x2e/0x55 [<021855dc>] sys_mount+0x121/0x1f9 Code: 8b 40 50 8b 40 34 85 c0 74 2b 0f b7 80 9e 01 00 00 66 85 c0 I use the following fstab lines to mount my ntfs partitions and they worked until now (until the previous versione of kernel): /dev/hda1 /mnt/win_main ntfs noauto,users,umask=0222,gid=windows,ro 0 0 /dev/hda2 /mnt/win_data ntfs noauto,users,umask=0222,gid=windows,ro 0 0 Thanks. Igor. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-06 00:12:32
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2700081 By: djf_jeff Same problem as first poster. Fedora Core 2 Kernel 2.6.7-1.494.2.2 i686 Kernel oops in the boot process at "Mounting local filesystem" (I have ntfs partition mount at boot) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-05 22:00:12
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2699934 By: szaka > What if the destination drive is not empty? It depends on the partition table. You might need to modify or completely recreate it. > What's wrong with my way of rebuilding the MBR by the recovery > console? The first 512 bytes of a disk has the MBR, the partition table (if there aren't logical partitions) and other things. When you do something to create some kind of MBR, and use a partitioning tool (parted) that's very famous to create non-bootable partitions for Windows and you ignore other things then don't really expect that things will work fine. Depending on many factors boot might or might not work. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-05 15:00:47
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2699291 By: nobody Yep same thing on 2 different machines, one smp, one single. I guess someone oopsed (~: ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-05 12:09:50
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2698862 By: nobody I've got the same problem. Does anybody know how to fix this? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-05 08:41:18
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2698614 By: nobody Hello I got this kernel oops when trying to mount an ntfs partition. Any ideas? My system: Fedora Core 2 Kernel 2.6.7-1.494.2.2 i686 dmesg output: NTFS driver 2.1.15 [Flags: R/W MODULE]. NTFS-fs warning (device hÑ0): ntfs_fill_super(): Atime updates are not implemented yet. Disabling them. Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 000581a6 printing eip: 431b53ec *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 ntfs(U) snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec snd_pcm snd_timer snd_page_alloc gameport snd_mpu401_uart snd_rawmidi snd_seq_device snd_mixer_oss snd soundcore radeon parport_pc lp parport autofs4 rfcomm l2cap bluetooth ds yenta_socket pcmcia_core sunrpc e100 mii floppy sg microcode vfat fat dm_mod sd_mod joydev usb_storage scsi_mod ohci_hcd ehci_hcd button battery asus_acpi ac ipv6 ext3 jbd CPU: 0 EIP: 0060:[<431b53ec>] Not tainted EFLAGS: 00010202 (2.6.7-1.494.2.2) EIP is at ntfs_fill_super+0x16c/0x677 [ntfs] eax: 00058172 ebx: 41fb9580 ecx: 02312ef6 edx: 41fb9580 esi: 00000000 edi: 41fb9654 ebp: 12088800 esp: 133b1e8c ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 Process mount (pid: 5216, threadinfo=133b1000 task=148b5930) Stack: 0231181a 00000000 00000000 15a6ad34 12088800 15a6ad00 00000000 02169087 31616468 00000000 41fcf080 000000d0 133b1ec4 022f5da2 41f9cb80 00000246 133a1000 fffffff4 41f9cb80 431c00a0 431b5916 00000000 431b5280 0216924c Call Trace: [<02169087>] get_sb_bdev+0xdf/0x11b [<022f5da2>] __cond_resched+0x14/0x3b [<431b5916>] ntfs_get_sb+0xe/0x11 [ntfs] [<431b5280>] ntfs_fill_super+0x0/0x677 [ntfs] [<0216924c>] do_kern_mount+0x8a/0x13a [<021845d2>] do_new_mount+0x61/0x90 [<021850ff>] do_mount+0x176/0x18e [<0215e37e>] get_user_size+0x2e/0x55 [<021855dc>] sys_mount+0x121/0x1f9 Code: 8b 40 34 85 c0 74 2b 0f b7 80 9e 01 00 00 66 85 c0 74 1f 0f ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-04 23:05:28
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2698120 By: nobody i have kernel 2.6.7-mm7 i want read ntfs with as non-root. i use mount -t ntfs -o ro,nls=utf8,gid=100,umas=550 /dev... /mnt/... but ls /mnt/hda1 d------r-- /mnt/hda1 and /proc/mounts has ntfs ... .... umask=01024 mounted ntfs has other chmod ... if i use umask=644 = ls -al drw-r-x--x /mnt/hda1 ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-04 19:17:03
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2697834 By: muhkuh27 What if the destination drive is not empty? Doing a dd of the MBR would destroy the partition table on the new drive and would make other data on it inaccessible. What's wrong with my way of rebuilding the MBR by the recovery console? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-04 16:21:53
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2697561 By: szaka This is the best way (hdd is empty): 1. dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdd bs=512 count=1 2. ntfsclone -O /dev/hdd1 /dev/hda1 3. switch cables so hdd is hda 4. reboot ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-04 16:14:21
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2697547 By: muhkuh27 There is something wrong with the partition using ntfsclone. May be it's my fault but I don't see what I'm doing wrong. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-04 16:09:22
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2697536 By: muhkuh27 I did: 1. create a partition of required size using parted (hdd1) 2. dd if=/dev/hda1 of=/def/hdd1 bs=8192 3. unhide, set bootable hdd1 4. switched cables so hdd is now hda 5. rebooted To create the correct MBR I boot from the windows xp installation cd, run the recovery console and do a "fixmbr". This worked. When I replace step 2 with ntfsclone -O /dev/hdd1 /dev/hda1 it hangs during boot. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-04 15:30:02
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2697449 By: szaka You dd partition or disk? It's not the same. dd'ing a disk is supposed to work. Boot also must work if you ntfsclone a partition after dd'ing a disk because the partition table is ok. But if you [cs]fdisk/parted a disk and then ntfsclone then it's not necessarily work. Of course if you dd a disk after this then that will work too but not if you dd only the partition. When boot fails due to not being able to access a file then it usually means BIOS calls can't access all the needed files during boot and before Windows would get full control (1024 cylinders limit, etc) because e.g. the CHS values in the partition table aren't ok. it's a very well known issue when one wants to clone a system but make a mistake. On the other hand, ntfsclone corrupting files were never reported or noticed although it's used actively for over a year. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-04 14:41:33
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2697172 By: muhkuh27 Finally registered an accout. I only want to clone a NTFS partition that is bootable. I used the WinXP recovery console to get the mbr on the new hard disk right. It really started booting but couldn't access a file during the boot process which is caused by data corruption in my opinion. When I use dd to copy the partition to the new drive it works as expected so I don't think theres a problem with partitioning. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-04 14:40:31
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2697166 By: szaka The MBR and the relevant partition table (entry) must be also exactly the same. So in the disk cloning case, this is also needed before using ntfsclone: dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdd bs=512 count=1 ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-04 14:26:52
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2697144 By: nobody I made sure the new hard disk is hda and the new partition is hda1 as it was the case with the old one. This is not the problem. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
