Hi,
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 14:45 +0200, Jeroen Janssen wrote:
> I could not find any explicit statement in the documentation on this, but
> maybe I overlooked and someone can point me to the right place.
>
> I'm looking for a statement declaring that "images generated by ntfsclone
> don't have to be placed under the GPL license, since the image itself is
> merely data to ntfsclone" or something alike this statement.
>
> Can someone tell me if this is explicitly declared somewhere in the
> (ntfsclone) documentation?
It is not stated as far as I know but I don't see why it needs to be.
Obviously images generated are not GPL. GPL is to do with software and
an image is not software, it is data. The GPL does not and even cannot
apply to data.
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
|