You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(30) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(63) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(28) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(70) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(13) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-12 04:43:46
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3334157 By: paulway Hi there! I've been trying to repartition my 60GB drive for a couple of days now. I want a 10GB ext2 partition on the end of it so I can boot into Linux but at the moment the NTFS partition (running Windows 2000) takes all the space. I'm using the ntfsresize and qt_parted programs on the System Rescue CD version 0.2.7 (don't know actual version numbers). I've done several defragmentations in Windows but each time ntfsresize (and qt_parted) says that there is only a couple of kilobytes of space at the end of the partition that can be resized. I'm now running a defragmentation in Safe Mode, after having deleted a bunch of junk that I was stalling over doing anything about (got me an extra 5GB). When I get home tonight I'll try it again to see if this makes any difference. Previously I'd tried turning off everything that could be writing to the disk (not in Safe Mode though). However... my next thought was to use ntfsclone to take a copy of the entire partition, then blow the whole partition table away. Make a 50MB boot partition, a 50GB NTFS partition and a ~9GB root ext2 partition, and finally use ntfsclone to put the NTFS partition back 'where it came from'. I can't see anything in the ntfsclone documentation that states that the partition must be exactly the same size as what it came from, but then there's nothing in there that says that it can be different either. I've used Ghost in the past and it won't try to restore an image to a partition of a different size, so I'm guessing the same might apply here. Does it? The next thing to do is to use Windows Backup to back up the disk, then blow the partition away and reinstall Windows and restore the backup. This is ugly and not sure of success. The 160GB disk I'd be backing up to and restoring from is going to another machine, so it can't stay in this one unfortunately. Thanks in advance, Paul Wayper (pa...@ma...) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-12 04:30:44
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3334149 By: paulway Try the System Rescue CD - http://www.sysresccd.org/ Have fun, Paul ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-11 18:05:46
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3333767 By: firecat53 After one successful install of Ubuntu on my laptop, I'm attempting an install on our main desktop, to dual-boot with XP. The desktop is a three-year old Gateway with a 60GB single partition hard drive. I've tried unsuccessfully numerous times to repartition the hard drive using ntfsresize(both on the Ubunutu 5.04 install disk and from a Knoppix 3.9 CD) and keep getting numerous 'cluster accounting errors' when ntfsresize initially looks over the filesystem. I've tried the 'chkdsk /f' and 'chkdsk /r' from XP and both finish successfully but still don't change the outcome of the ntfsresize. I've downloaded the most recent version of ntfsprogs (v. 1.11.2) on a rescue CD (RIP - Linux) and tried that, as it was supposed to fix some of the errors people encountered using ntfsresize, but got the same result. The XP install works fine and no errors are generated from the chkdsk or a defrag. I'm at a loss!! I'd really hate to reinstall windows again if I can avoid it, but I do recognize that could be the next step unless someone has an idea of what to fix! Thanks, Scott ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-11 15:32:24
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3333664 By: j0nek I have an old image of an NTFS Partition I once made with dd. Now ich want to loop mount it which fails :(. I use this command # mount -t ntfs -o loop,nls=utf8 hda3.img /mnt resulting in the error mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0, missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so looking up as suggested # dmesg |tail gives: [...] NTFS-fs error (device loop0): load_system_files(): Failed to load $Bitmap. NTFS-fs error (device loop0): ntfs_fill_super(): Failed to load system files. What can I do to fix this problem? Thanks, Jonek. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-11 07:14:38
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3333416 By: nobody I really can't help with this, but I'd like to offer you guys my thanks and moral support, I'd love to have full read/write of NTFS partitions under Linux. Go team go! ;) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-10 07:09:38
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3332682 By: uvman The most common cause is that Windows is hibernated. Another common issue is that you did not shutdown Windows (or Linux) properly. Please reboot back to Windows, shutdown (no hibernate) and try again. It should work ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-10 06:28:18
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3332666 By: nobody My ntfs partition no mount by ntfsmount. I compile kernel 2.6.11.11, fuse 2.3.0 and ntfsprogs. ntfsmount version 1.11.2. Module fuse.ko loaded ok. I try mount ntfs partition /dev/hda1 and get next message: bash-3.00# ntfsmount /mnt/temp -o dev=/dev/hda1 Couldn't mount device '/dev/hda1': Operation not supported It's seems that logfile check failed. Try to mount volume in windows. Mount failed. Help me, please. Sory for my bad english. Thanks for your help. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-09 12:16:55
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3331694 By: nobody Hi all I am trying to understand the internals of LDM database. If anyone has gone deep into the source code can u pls explain me the ldm_frag_add(). It looks as if it is collecting all fragments of the same group. But somehow the buffer in which the data is collected seems to be totally weird. It seems that the header is not collected, the fragments that come one by one are overwritten on the previous data(from a previous fragment). If we are not collecting the data correctly, how would we parse it? From the source code it looks that ldm_parse_* assumes that data is pointing to the start of the VBLK, including the header. can anyone pls comment the ldm_frag_add() and post it?? If this is the wrong forum to ask this question, pls guide me to the correct place regards ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-08 19:58:28
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3330806 By: uvman Why did you reply to a non-related 18-months-old post? Details for how to find out what RPM you need can be found in: http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/rpm/instructions.html ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-08 19:44:42
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3330774 By: nobody what is the right rpm. how to know that? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-06 18:33:13
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3327360 By: nobody Thank you a lot. This issue made my go out of my mind. Thank you .... Ugluk ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-06 18:23:27
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3327342 By: uvman For a 1 byte (8 bits) integer, the sum of both should be 2^8. ... For a 4 bytes (32 bits) integer, the sum of both should be 2^32. ... [1] http://www.duke.edu/~twf/cps104/twoscomp.html ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-06 18:10:13
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3327334 By: nobody Hmm i'm real dum :(... how the conversion to signed value is performed? from 0xFE8601A0 to (-0x179fe60)? Thank you again Ugluk ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-06 17:47:57
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3327305 By: uvman (Why did you use both the '0x' prefix and the 'H' suffix?) 0xFE8601A0 ~ (-0x179fe60) PREVIOUS_LCN + LCNOFFSET = 0x019E740A + (-0x179fe60) = 0x2475AA. So the next record will be: PREVIOUS_LCN = 0x2475AA LCNOFFSET = 0x0353CC80 ClustersCount = 928 ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-06 17:38:20
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3327284 By: uvman 3) Let's assume record X has grown too large. It already has an attribute list (0x20) and you need to add another attribute, but if you will add a single more byte, the run list of the attribute list will not have any more space. So you will allocate a new MFT record and put another instance of a 0x20 attribute there (a second atribute list). But now you have another 0x20 attribute, which must appear before any >0x20 attribute of that file. so you put it first in the first attriubte list. This ensures that it will be linked from the first attribute list instance. One of the fields in the attribute list entry is the MFT record number that the attribute belongs to. So the first attribute list will point to another attribute list and this field will point on the extent record. Disclaimer: I'm not 100% sure. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-06 17:35:59
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3327278 By: nobody record length = 416 (so the fixups does not alter the data runs) . Anyway after i've applied the fixups the situation is the same. The sum of clusters count is the same as in the nonresident attribute header. This are the dataruns 00000000: 31 20 4A 26 60 43 B6 14|01 C0 52 33 01 31 10 BE 00000010: 14 01 11 10 18 11 20 18|11 10 28 11 20 18 11 10 00000020: 30 11 20 18 31 0A 8A E5|09 42 80 3C A0 01 86 FE 00000030: 42 A0 03 80 CC 53 03 00| This is a dump of the data run chain. [2132] PREVIOUS_LCN = 0x00000000H [2132] LCNOFFSET = 0x0060264AH [2132] ClustersCount = 32 [2132] [2132] PREVIOUS_LCN = 0x0060264AH [2132] LCNOFFSET = 0x013352C0H [2132] ClustersCount = 70838 [2132] [2132] PREVIOUS_LCN = 0x0193790AH [2132] LCNOFFSET = 0x000114BEH [2132] ClustersCount = 16 [2132] [2132] PREVIOUS_LCN = 0x01948DC8H [2132] LCNOFFSET = 0x00000018H [2132] ClustersCount = 16 [2132] [2132] [2132] PREVIOUS_LCN = 0x01948DE0H [2132] LCNOFFSET = 0x00000018H [2132] ClustersCount = 32 [2132] [2132] [2132] PREVIOUS_LCN = 0x01948DF8H [2132] LCNOFFSET = 0x00000028H [2132] ClustersCount = 16 [2132] [2132] [2132] PREVIOUS_LCN = 0x01948E20H [2132] LCNOFFSET = 0x00000018H [2132] ClustersCount = 32 [2132] [2132] [2132] PREVIOUS_LCN = 0x01948E38H [2132] LCNOFFSET = 0x00000030H [2132] ClustersCount = 16 [2132] [2132] [2132] PREVIOUS_LCN = 0x01948E68H [2132] LCNOFFSET = 0x00000018H [2132] ClustersCount = 32 [2132] [2132] [2132] PREVIOUS_LCN = 0x01948E80H [2132] LCNOFFSET = 0x0009E58AH [2132] ClustersCount = 10 [2132] [2132] [2132] PREVIOUS_LCN = 0x019E740AH !! here is where it goes crazy [2132] LCNOFFSET = 0xFE8601A0H [2132] ClustersCount = 15488 [2132] [2132] [2132] PREVIOUS_LCN = 0x8318726AH [2132] LCNOFFSET = 0x0353CC80H [2132] ClustersCount = 928 Thank you, Ugluk ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-06 16:38:13
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3327201 By: nobody currently i have xp installed on C:\. I want to red hat linux ver 3.0. I have serial ATA controller. ( SATA). ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-05 23:21:24
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3326264 By: nobody Anyway there is some dirty data between the dataruns and 0xFFFFFFFF mark ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-05 23:19:01
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3326263 By: nobody for 2) i suppose i extract the attribute content from the data runs for 3) the question is how is the new allocated record is refferenced. Thank you a lot Ulgluk ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-05 23:16:54
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3326261 By: nobody thank you for the fast reply Fixups are an issue i stayed far from. In my humile knowledge about fixups they can exist only at the end of the sector but this run is not at the end of the sector of the record... ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-05 22:13:41
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3326226 By: pkar Thank you for your complete answer. I will try ntfsmount first. And I also want to thank you for this significant project and hope to see even more progress. Panagiotis ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44085 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-05 21:55:11
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3326211 By: uvman When an attribute grows large, there are 3 ways to deal with it. 1) Make it non-resident. (you already know that one) 2) When all the attributes that can be non-resident are indeed non-resident, an attribute list is allocated. Basically, it will make the MFT record (except the 0x10 attribute) non-resident. All attributes >0x20 are moved outside the MFT record into the payload of the attribute list. 3) When the attribute list is so fragmented that it can't be stored in one MFT record, an extension MFT record is allocated. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-05 21:51:01
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3326210 By: uvman Have you removed the fixup? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-05 21:49:09
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3326208 By: nobody For example ATTR_DATA. What happens if the file is so fragmented that the data runs cannot be contained in only one reccord. I think it is related to ATTR_LIST. Please if anyone can explain .. Thanks, Ugluk ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-05 21:44:59
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3326204 By: nobody Observation The data run seems ok because sum(clusterscount) = nonres.EndingVCN - nonres.StartingLCN + 1 given the following data run: 42 80 3C A0 01 86 FE this is decoded as 4 bytes for offset 2 bytes for clusters count so ClustersCount = 0x3C80 ClusterOffset = 0xFE8601A0 How do I compute the new offset because after performing (char*)&ClusterOffset[4 - 1] &= 0x7F ;//0x7F = 0111 1111 clearing the bit sign the offset still overflows boundaries of the partition Is there any standard algorithm for clearing / transforming ClusterOffset's high bits in case that the sign bit is setted ? Thanks in advance Ugluk ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=44084 |
