Re: [Libvncserver-common] Proper TurboVNC encoding support -- redux

[DRC <dco...@us...>]

On 3/22/12 9:06 AM, Christian Beier wrote:
> But then we would get into what you mentioned: People would complain
> about CPU usage and performance on their LAN. They should only get
> turbo-CL 3 when they selected a high tight CL (like 8 or 9). My
> reasoning is that 1 == fast CPU-wise and little compression, 5 == still
> fast, but good compression (turbo CL2 - which should be the default
> for most cases), 8 and 9 == really tight compression but quite high CPU
> usage in return. So that CLs 8 and 9 are really for the low-bandwidth
> case. Tight CL 8 or 9 is in no VNC client the default setting AFAIK.
> Goes along with http://www.tightvnc.com/vncviewer.1.php for instance.

Fair enough.  We'll just need to make sure we document the behavior.  To
be clear, though, do you want 8 to also map to the new mode or just 9?
Your previous message said that you proposed to map just 9 to the new level.