From: Martin H. <ma...@he...> - 2011-03-28 21:01:55
|
Hi again, I've been wondering - what's the "accepted" approach to updating the wiki? Should everybody with write access (I seem to have write access) just go ahead, or should there be some discussion about proposed changes first? I know, changes in the Wiki can be backed out again relatively easily, but just like in CVS (or git, or whatever), that causes extra work, that might be avoided by simply talking about changes one wants to make. For now, what I have in mind is to make some minor changes to the OpenVPN chapter (since it obviously needs work) - but I don't want to alienate those who did all of the work so far, by making some changes and "breaking the rules" in the process. So, I figured I'd ask first... Martin -- I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my phone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my phone -- Bjarne Stroustrup |