RE: [leaf-user] Bering-uClibc Docs and IPSEC: FreeSwan or OpenSwan?

[Calvin W. <cwe...@ec...>]

On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 14:06, Peter Mueller wrote:
> > > Given that Bering* only runs on the 2.4 kernel and to my knowledge 
> > > does not include the backport of the Kernel 2.6 Native 
> > IPSEC code, you 
> > > want the Kernel 2.4 docs (http://shorewall.net/IPSEC.htm) 
> > regardless 
> > > of what  color your Swans are.
> > > 
> > > -Tom
> > 
> > Thanks Tom. I've been referencing that page already. It's 
> > great for the configuration items. What about initial IPSEC 
> > setup, though (i.e. generating keys, etc.). That's supposed 
> > to be in the *Swan docs that are missing. What is everyone 
> > else using? Am I the only one trying to survive on pre-built packages?
> 
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/buipsec.html
> 
> Jacques's documentation is still relevant and nice :).  Bering-uClibC is
> basically bering that's more up to date with a smaller compiler.
> 
> P
Thank you Peter! I keep forgetting about going back to the Bering docs.
Even though often I have to extrapolate for Bering-uClibc, it's better
than no docs.

You should see my desktop right now. I've got 4 Firefox browsers with 8
or more tabs in each, along with several terminal windows for mounted
LEAF images, running QEMU sessions, gedit, mail and whatnot. It would
sure be nice to have a single source for the docs, since there are so
many of them.