Re: [Lcms-user] ILM's CTL on SF

[darby j. <dar...@ya...>]

--- Kai-Uwe Behrmann <ku...@gm...> wrote:

> just for your information:
> 
> The Color Transformation Language code was brought
> recently to 
> SourceForge.

How does this compare to lcms? Is it complementary or
a substitute?

The sourceforge page lists the license as
"other/proprietary", but it looks like BSD with some
extra legalese.