Re: [K3d-development] DrQueue wiki talk page
Brought to you by:
barche
From: Timothy M. S. <ts...@k-...> - 2006-12-31 02:57:27
|
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 00:10 -0800, Joe Crawford wrote: > > My question was whether drqueue actually sees any use - because the > > current rendering code is already has about 80% of the required > > functionality, drqueue integration may-or-may-not be worth the effort. > > >From a integration standpoint it could mean a lot, because Dr Queue > manages tasks for s many other 3D apps/renders. Its nice if people can > use the same tool they use to mange their other renders. > > Also, k3d would be a feature for the Dr Queue community too. As I outlined in the Wiki, I want to have a unified system for local and remote rendering, including good integration with the UI. We also have to continue support for zero-setup out-of-the-box local rendering. If that can be implemented in terms of DrQueue so much the better, but it implies writing - at a minimum - a K-3D DrQueue client. So far, I haven't heard back from the DrQueue author on my requests for information about the DrQueue protocol, which isn't encouraging. This isn't a priority, it only came up now because he contacted us, so we'll see what happens. Cheers, Tim |