Re: [Jython-dev] 22a1 PyDictionary exposed as 'dict'

[Samuele P. <ped...@st...>]

Mike Garcia (Paris) wrote:

> I'm stoked!!  Got the first containsKey Map method running in the new 
> style pyDictinoary.  There is a special way to configure the methods 
> you want exposed to jython.  Basically you have to create an 'exposed' 
> class that extends PyBuiltinFuntionNarrow and set it accordingly. 
>
> I'll have to spend a couple of days to pick up all of the Map 
> implementations on the new style PyDictionary but I think it looks good. 
>
>
but we don't want them exposed on Python side!

>>>> execfile(r"c:\jython21\jython_latest\tests\imports.py")
>
> Put some stuff into a python dictionary
>
> {987: val2, 234: foobar, 1: val1}
>
>>>> pyd
>
> {987: val2, 234: foobar, 1: val1}
>
>>>> pyd[987]
>
> Traceback (innermost last):
>
>   File "<console>", line 1, in ?
>
> KeyError: 987  * <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<  This is funky though, does not 
> work with an imported dictionary*
>
>>>> pyd[9899]=123434
>
>>>> pyd[9899]
>
> 123434
>
>>>> pyd.containsKey()
>
> Traceback (innermost last):
>
>   File "<console>", line 1, in ?
>
> TypeError: containsKey() takes exactly one argument (0 given) <<< way 
> cool, huh?!
>
>>>> pyd.containsKey(9899)  <*< yes!!*
>
> 1
>
>>>> pyd.containsValue(9899) * << just checking my sanity... (to be done)*
>
> Traceback (innermost last):
>
>   File "<console>", line 1, in ?
>
> AttributeError: 'dict' object has no attribute 'containsValue'
>
>>>> pyd.containsKey(987)* <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<  This is funky though, 
> does not work with an imported dictionary*
>
> 0
>
>>>> pyd.containsKey(9)* <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<  This is funky though, 
> does not work with an imported dictionary*
>
> 0
>
>>>> pyd
>
> {9899: 123434, 987: val2, 234: foobar, 1: val1}
>
>>>> pyd.containsKey(1)
>
> 0
>
>>>> isinstance(pyd,Map)* <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ** This bothers me** 
> becaus**e it should tell me TRUE now*
>
> 0
>
>>>> hm=HashMap(pyd)* <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ** What we are** looking** 
> for right*
>
>>>> hm
>
> {<javainstance object 1>=<javainstance object 2>, <javainstance object 
> 3>=<javainstance object 4>, 9899=123434
>
> , <javainstance object 5>=<javainstance object 6>}*<<<<<<** Yuck, what 
> up w/ the repr!*
>
>>>> hm.containsKey(9899)
>
> 0
>
>>>> hm.containsKey(1)
>
> 0
>
>>>> hm.keySet()
>
> [<javainstance object 1>, <javainstance object 3>, 9899, <javainstance 
> object 5>]
>
>>>> iter = hm.keySet().iterator()
>
>>>> iter.hasNext()
>
> 1                              * <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ** Our 
> PyDictionary created data in a new HashMap*
>
>>>> iter.next()
>
> 987                            * <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ** Our 
> PyDictionary created data in a new HashMap*
>
>>>> iter.next()
>
> 1                              * <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ** Our 
> PyDictionary created data in a new HashMap*
>
>>>> iter.next()
>
> 9899                           * <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ** Our 
> PyDictionary created data in a new HashMap*
>
>>>> iter.next()
>
> 234                            * <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ** Our 
> PyDictionary created data in a new HashMap*
>
>>>> iter.hasNext()
>
> 0
>
>>>> hm
>
> {<javainstance object 1>=<javainstance object 2>, <javainstance object 
> 3>=<javainstance object 4>, 9899=123434
>
> , <javainstance object 5>=<javainstance object 6>}
>
>>>> pyd
>
> {9899: 123434, 987: val2, 234: foobar, 1: val1}
>
>>>> pyd.containsKey(9899)
>
> 1
>
>>>> 1==1 * <<<<<<<< couldn't believe it*
>
> 1
>
>>>>
>
> Hope to get a patch in soon for this baby along with the new PyIterator.
>
> Re,
>
> Mike
>