You can subscribe to this list here.
2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(51) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
Jan
(105) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(194) |
Apr
(145) |
May
(100) |
Jun
(111) |
Jul
(117) |
Aug
(126) |
Sep
(233) |
Oct
(138) |
Nov
(164) |
Dec
(109) |
2002 |
Jan
(216) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(216) |
Apr
(194) |
May
(157) |
Jun
(140) |
Jul
(158) |
Aug
(73) |
Sep
(105) |
Oct
(164) |
Nov
(104) |
Dec
(95) |
2003 |
Jan
(72) |
Feb
(69) |
Mar
(81) |
Apr
(151) |
May
(101) |
Jun
(139) |
Jul
(99) |
Aug
(118) |
Sep
(115) |
Oct
(151) |
Nov
(161) |
Dec
(102) |
2004 |
Jan
(120) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(106) |
Apr
(111) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(78) |
Jul
(76) |
Aug
(105) |
Sep
(94) |
Oct
(143) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(85) |
2005 |
Jan
(99) |
Feb
(77) |
Mar
(164) |
Apr
(97) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(102) |
Sep
(95) |
Oct
(129) |
Nov
(123) |
Dec
(52) |
2006 |
Jan
(48) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(90) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(81) |
Jun
(136) |
Jul
(56) |
Aug
(109) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(74) |
Dec
(75) |
2007 |
Jan
(92) |
Feb
(137) |
Mar
(93) |
Apr
(79) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(74) |
Jul
(143) |
Aug
(175) |
Sep
(154) |
Oct
(137) |
Nov
(88) |
Dec
(90) |
2008 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(113) |
Mar
(167) |
Apr
(88) |
May
(105) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(87) |
Aug
(72) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(102) |
Dec
(70) |
2009 |
Jan
(115) |
Feb
(113) |
Mar
(126) |
Apr
(58) |
May
(125) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(125) |
Sep
(84) |
Oct
(61) |
Nov
(111) |
Dec
(61) |
2010 |
Jan
(85) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(130) |
Apr
(58) |
May
(57) |
Jun
(32) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(41) |
Oct
(65) |
Nov
(63) |
Dec
(24) |
2011 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(31) |
Mar
(28) |
Apr
(68) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(58) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(51) |
Oct
(76) |
Nov
(60) |
Dec
(9) |
2012 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(39) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(28) |
Dec
(18) |
2013 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(36) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(35) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(31) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(22) |
2014 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(9) |
2015 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(18) |
2016 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(2) |
2017 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(3) |
2018 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(6) |
2019 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(1) |
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Fabio Z. <fa...@gm...> - 2024-02-04 11:04:45
|
PyDev 12.0.0 Release Highlights - *Debugger* - *sys.monitoring* is now used in Python 3.12 (and it's *much* faster than any previous version). - A new setting was added in the *Preferences > PyDev > Debug* to debug *just my code* (meaning that when stepping it will just step into files under PyDev source folders). - Improved the step into function (activated with *Ctrl+Alt* then *Click function* to step into). - Support for Python 3.6 and 3.7 was dropped (only Python 3.8 onwards is now supported). - *Ruff* - Ruff can now be used as a code formatter. - The latest ruff (*0.1.x*) is now supported (as it broke backward compatibility in its *0.1.0* version). - *Code Analysis* - Fixes in semantic analysis to better determine if strings in annotations should be checked for symbols or not. Note: *Only Python 3.8 onwards is now supported* * *Python 3.6* and *3.7* support is now *dropped* (please use *PyDev 11.0.3* if you still use it). About PyDev PyDev is an open-source Python IDE on top of Eclipse for Python (also available for Python on Visual Studio Code). It comes with goodies such as code completion, syntax highlighting, syntax analysis, code analysis, refactor, debug, interactive console, etc. It is also available as a standalone through LiClipse with goodies such as multiple cursors, theming and support for many other languages, such as Django Templates, Jinja2, Html, JavaScript, etc. Links: PyDev: http://pydev.org PyDev Blog: http://pydev.blogspot.com PyDev on VSCode: http://pydev.org/vscode LiClipse: http://www.liclipse.com PyVmMonitor - Python Profiler: http://www.pyvmmonitor.com/ Cheers, Fabio Zadrozny |
From: Bill M. <bil...@gm...> - 2023-07-25 13:57:24
|
<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div dir="ltr"><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div dir="ltr"></div><div dir="ltr">Dear Jeff (and others),</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">I wanted to add my words of encouragement towards developing a Python 3.x version of Jython. </div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Your work, which provides the connection between the gentle, and user-friendly (programmer-friendly) Python syntax and great API, with the industrial-strength Java capabilities and API, makes all kinds of projects and work possible, that - chances are - you will never hear about. </div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">I am the co-developer of JythonMusic, which I now see is included as one of the many projects made possible through your work on Jython.org. (JythonMusic is available at JythonMusic.org.)</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Thank you for your great work. Words cannot begin to describe the appreciation felt on this end. You have made more than a decade of productive and creative works possible, and this is just on our end. </div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">This is to say that your work is being used in ways that you may never know. And is deeply appreciated. </div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Thank you. </div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Best,</div><div dir="ltr">Bill</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"><div>--</div><div>Bill Manaris, Ph.D.</div><div>Professor, Computer Science</div><div>Director, Computing in the Arts</div><div>College of Charleston, USA</div><div>http://manaris.org</div><div>http://cita.cofc.edu</div><div><br></div></div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On Jul 25, 2023, at 2:50 AM, Jeff Allen <ja...@fa...> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> <p>Thanks to all who have given their +1s to this. I'm genuinely heartened that others think this is still worthwhile.</p> <p>There is a lot of change to take on between Python 2.7 and any recent 3 (not just print()), but also it seemed the time to implement the core in a more modern way.</p> <p>There was a time when I just wanted to try these ideas in a corner, in case the ideas were all wrong. (I hate wasting others' time.) It looks like they aren't *all* wrong. At the moment I'm working to integrate a contributed compiler front-end (Python to AST) which endeavor I think will drive forward other parts of the core still missing.<br> </p> <p>Jeff Allen</p> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/07/2023 13:32, John A. Hayes wrote:<br> </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:D8B...@gm..."> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> I think the conclusion from all this mail-list activity is there is great interest in a Jython 3.X. Rather than just saying I’m another +1 (which is true), is there a short-list of things that need to be achieved to reach Python 3+ compatibility? <div class=""><br class=""> </div> <div class="">In my naive experience as a Python user, the most substantive difference between Python 2+ and Python 3+ was the transition between “print” being a statement in 2 and a function in 3 and that seems trivial. All the other changes were under the hood and not important from a user’s perspective.</div> <div class=""><br class=""> </div> <div class="">If there are more corner cases, I’m happy to help,<br class=""> <div class=""><br class=""> </div> <div class="">All the best, and I’m a super big fan of the project; it’s just a bit mysterious how any of us can help.</div> <div class=""><br class=""> </div> <div class="">John<br class=""> <div><br class=""> <blockquote type="cite" class=""> <div class="">On Jul 15, 2023, at 1:31 AM, Liam Coughlin <<a href="mailto:lsc...@gm..." class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">lsc...@gm...</a>> wrote:</div> <br class="Apple-interchange-newline"> <div class=""> <div dir="ltr" class="">+2 for jython 3 - wait am I doing this right?<br class=""> </div> <br class=""> <div class="gmail_quote"> <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 2:13 AM Jon R. Fox <<a href="mailto:drj...@gm..." class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">drj...@gm...</a>> wrote:<br class=""> </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <div dir="ltr" class=""> <div dir="ltr" class="">+1 for Jython 3.x</div> <div class="">I'm using Groovy for now.</div> <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"> <div dir="ltr" class=""><br class=""> </div> </div> </div> _______________________________________________<br class=""> Jython-users mailing list<br class=""> <a href="mailto:Jyt...@li..." target="_blank" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">Jyt...@li...</a><br class=""> <a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users</a><br class=""> </blockquote> </div> _______________________________________________<br class=""> Jython-users mailing list<br class=""> <a href="mailto:Jyt...@li..." class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">Jyt...@li...</a><br class=""> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users</a><br class=""> </div> </blockquote> </div> <br class=""> </div> </div> <br> <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset> <br> <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset> <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________ Jython-users mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Jyt...@li...">Jyt...@li...</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users</a> </pre> </blockquote> <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- Jeff Allen </pre> <span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Jython-users mailing list</span><br><span>Jyt...@li...</span><br><span>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users</span><br></div></blockquote></div></body></html> |
From: Jeff A. <ja...@fa...> - 2023-07-25 06:49:57
|
Thanks to all who have given their +1s to this. I'm genuinely heartened that others think this is still worthwhile. There is a lot of change to take on between Python 2.7 and any recent 3 (not just print()), but also it seemed the time to implement the core in a more modern way. There was a time when I just wanted to try these ideas in a corner, in case the ideas were all wrong. (I hate wasting others' time.) It looks like they aren't *all* wrong. At the moment I'm working to integrate a contributed compiler front-end (Python to AST) which endeavor I think will drive forward other parts of the core still missing. Jeff Allen On 15/07/2023 13:32, John A. Hayes wrote: > I think the conclusion from all this mail-list activity is there is > great interest in a Jython 3.X. Rather than just saying I’m another +1 > (which is true), is there a short-list of things that need to be > achieved to reach Python 3+ compatibility? > > In my naive experience as a Python user, the most substantive > difference between Python 2+ and Python 3+ was the transition between > “print” being a statement in 2 and a function in 3 and that seems > trivial. All the other changes were under the hood and not important > from a user’s perspective. > > If there are more corner cases, I’m happy to help, > > All the best, and I’m a super big fan of the project; it’s just a bit > mysterious how any of us can help. > > John > >> On Jul 15, 2023, at 1:31 AM, Liam Coughlin <lsc...@gm...> wrote: >> >> +2 for jython 3 - wait am I doing this right? >> >> On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 2:13 AM Jon R. Fox <drj...@gm...> wrote: >> >> +1 for Jython 3.x >> I'm using Groovy for now. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Jython-users mailing list >> Jyt...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Jython-users mailing list >> Jyt...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users -- Jeff Allen |
From: John A. H. <ja...@gm...> - 2023-07-16 06:08:11
|
Hi Stefan, Much appreciated for the feedback! Cheers, John > On Jul 15, 2023, at 12:22 PM, Stefan Richthofer <ste...@gm...> wrote: > > For the interested dev, Jython 3 is developed under the "main" branch: https://github.com/jython/jython/tree/main <https://github.com/jython/jython/tree/main> > Also see https://www.jython.org/jython-3-roadmap <https://www.jython.org/jython-3-roadmap> and https://www.jython.org/jython-3-mvp <https://www.jython.org/jython-3-mvp>. > Initially Python 3.8 was targeted since it was the Python version in development when the mvp discussion was formulated. > The target version was, however, somewhat recently adjusted to Python 3.11. > > Best, > > -Stefan > > Am Sa., 15. Juli 2023 um 17:09 Uhr schrieb Yaqiang Wang <yaq...@gm... <mailto:yaq...@gm...>>: > Some of the features of Python 3 attract me in this document: https://www.asmeurer.com/python3-presentation/python3-presentation.pdf <https://www.asmeurer.com/python3-presentation/python3-presentation.pdf>, including features 2, 9, 11, 12. > > Regards > Yaqiang > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 8:33 PM John A. Hayes <ja...@gm... <mailto:ja...@gm...>> wrote: > I think the conclusion from all this mail-list activity is there is great interest in a Jython 3.X. Rather than just saying I’m another +1 (which is true), is there a short-list of things that need to be achieved to reach Python 3+ compatibility? > > In my naive experience as a Python user, the most substantive difference between Python 2+ and Python 3+ was the transition between “print” being a statement in 2 and a function in 3 and that seems trivial. All the other changes were under the hood and not important from a user’s perspective. > > If there are more corner cases, I’m happy to help, > > All the best, and I’m a super big fan of the project; it’s just a bit mysterious how any of us can help. > > John > >> On Jul 15, 2023, at 1:31 AM, Liam Coughlin <lsc...@gm... <mailto:lsc...@gm...>> wrote: >> >> +2 for jython 3 - wait am I doing this right? >> >> On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 2:13 AM Jon R. Fox <drj...@gm... <mailto:drj...@gm...>> wrote: >> +1 for Jython 3.x >> I'm using Groovy for now. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Jython-users mailing list >> Jyt...@li... <mailto:Jyt...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users> >> _______________________________________________ >> Jython-users mailing list >> Jyt...@li... <mailto:Jyt...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users> > > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... <mailto:Jyt...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users> > > > -- > ************************************************* > Dr. Yaqiang Wang > Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences (CAMS) > 46, Zhong-Guan-Cun South Avenue > Beijing, 100081 > China > > yaq...@gm... <mailto:yaq...@gm...> > > www.meteothink.org <http://www.meteothink.org/> > ************************************************** > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... <mailto:Jyt...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users> > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users |
From: Stefan R. <ste...@gm...> - 2023-07-15 16:23:07
|
For the interested dev, Jython 3 is developed under the "main" branch: https://github.com/jython/jython/tree/main Also see https://www.jython.org/jython-3-roadmap and https://www.jython.org/jython-3-mvp. Initially Python 3.8 was targeted since it was the Python version in development when the mvp discussion was formulated. The target version was, however, somewhat recently adjusted to Python 3.11. Best, -Stefan Am Sa., 15. Juli 2023 um 17:09 Uhr schrieb Yaqiang Wang < yaq...@gm...>: > Some of the features of Python 3 attract me in this document: > https://www.asmeurer.com/python3-presentation/python3-presentation.pdf, > including features 2, 9, 11, 12. > > Regards > Yaqiang > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 8:33 PM John A. Hayes <ja...@gm...> wrote: > >> I think the conclusion from all this mail-list activity is there is great >> interest in a Jython 3.X. Rather than just saying I’m another +1 (which is >> true), is there a short-list of things that need to be achieved to reach >> Python 3+ compatibility? >> >> In my naive experience as a Python user, the most substantive difference >> between Python 2+ and Python 3+ was the transition between “print” being a >> statement in 2 and a function in 3 and that seems trivial. All the other >> changes were under the hood and not important from a user’s perspective. >> >> If there are more corner cases, I’m happy to help, >> >> All the best, and I’m a super big fan of the project; it’s just a bit >> mysterious how any of us can help. >> >> John >> >> On Jul 15, 2023, at 1:31 AM, Liam Coughlin <lsc...@gm...> wrote: >> >> +2 for jython 3 - wait am I doing this right? >> >> On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 2:13 AM Jon R. Fox <drj...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> +1 for Jython 3.x >>> I'm using Groovy for now. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Jython-users mailing list >>> Jyt...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Jython-users mailing list >> Jyt...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Jython-users mailing list >> Jyt...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users >> > > > -- > ************************************************* > Dr. Yaqiang Wang > Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences (CAMS) > 46, Zhong-Guan-Cun South Avenue > Beijing, 100081 > China > > yaq...@gm... > > www.meteothink.org > ************************************************** > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users > |
From: Yaqiang W. <yaq...@gm...> - 2023-07-15 15:09:28
|
Some of the features of Python 3 attract me in this document: https://www.asmeurer.com/python3-presentation/python3-presentation.pdf, including features 2, 9, 11, 12. Regards Yaqiang On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 8:33 PM John A. Hayes <ja...@gm...> wrote: > I think the conclusion from all this mail-list activity is there is great > interest in a Jython 3.X. Rather than just saying I’m another +1 (which is > true), is there a short-list of things that need to be achieved to reach > Python 3+ compatibility? > > In my naive experience as a Python user, the most substantive difference > between Python 2+ and Python 3+ was the transition between “print” being a > statement in 2 and a function in 3 and that seems trivial. All the other > changes were under the hood and not important from a user’s perspective. > > If there are more corner cases, I’m happy to help, > > All the best, and I’m a super big fan of the project; it’s just a bit > mysterious how any of us can help. > > John > > On Jul 15, 2023, at 1:31 AM, Liam Coughlin <lsc...@gm...> wrote: > > +2 for jython 3 - wait am I doing this right? > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 2:13 AM Jon R. Fox <drj...@gm...> wrote: > >> +1 for Jython 3.x >> I'm using Groovy for now. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Jython-users mailing list >> Jyt...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users > -- ************************************************* Dr. Yaqiang Wang Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences (CAMS) 46, Zhong-Guan-Cun South Avenue Beijing, 100081 China yaq...@gm... www.meteothink.org ************************************************** |
From: John A. H. <ja...@gm...> - 2023-07-15 12:33:14
|
I think the conclusion from all this mail-list activity is there is great interest in a Jython 3.X. Rather than just saying I’m another +1 (which is true), is there a short-list of things that need to be achieved to reach Python 3+ compatibility? In my naive experience as a Python user, the most substantive difference between Python 2+ and Python 3+ was the transition between “print” being a statement in 2 and a function in 3 and that seems trivial. All the other changes were under the hood and not important from a user’s perspective. If there are more corner cases, I’m happy to help, All the best, and I’m a super big fan of the project; it’s just a bit mysterious how any of us can help. John > On Jul 15, 2023, at 1:31 AM, Liam Coughlin <lsc...@gm...> wrote: > > +2 for jython 3 - wait am I doing this right? > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 2:13 AM Jon R. Fox <drj...@gm... <mailto:drj...@gm...>> wrote: > +1 for Jython 3.x > I'm using Groovy for now. > > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... <mailto:Jyt...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users> > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users |
From: Liam C. <lsc...@gm...> - 2023-07-15 05:31:50
|
+2 for jython 3 - wait am I doing this right? On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 2:13 AM Jon R. Fox <drj...@gm...> wrote: > +1 for Jython 3.x > I'm using Groovy for now. > > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users > |
From: Jon R. F. <drj...@gm...> - 2023-07-15 00:13:34
|
+1 for Jython 3.x I'm using Groovy for now. |
From: John H. <jhu...@ns...> - 2023-07-14 21:30:12
|
+1 from me too. -- Cheers -john On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:13 AM Juniarti Suryakusuma via Jython-users < jyt...@li...> wrote: > Jython 3 demand + 1 > > > On Jul 14, 2023, at 2:37 AM, Fernando Cassia <fc...@gm...> wrote: > > > > On 14/07/2023, Anamitra Bhattacharyya via Jython-users > > <jyt...@li...> wrote: > >> +1 on Jython 3. > >> > >> thanks > >> Anamitra Bhattacharyya > >> Maximo STSM > >> IBM Master Inventor > > > > +1 > > > > Cheers, > > FC > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jython-users mailing list > > Jyt...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users > |
From: Juniarti S. <jun...@ya...> - 2023-07-14 17:13:08
|
Jython 3 demand + 1 > On Jul 14, 2023, at 2:37 AM, Fernando Cassia <fc...@gm...> wrote: > > On 14/07/2023, Anamitra Bhattacharyya via Jython-users > <jyt...@li...> wrote: >> +1 on Jython 3. >> >> thanks >> Anamitra Bhattacharyya >> Maximo STSM >> IBM Master Inventor > > +1 > > Cheers, > FC > > > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users |
From: Fernando C. <fc...@gm...> - 2023-07-14 07:37:29
|
On 14/07/2023, Anamitra Bhattacharyya via Jython-users <jyt...@li...> wrote: > +1 on Jython 3. > > thanks > Anamitra Bhattacharyya > Maximo STSM > IBM Master Inventor +1 Cheers, FC |
From: Anamitra B. <abh...@us...> - 2023-07-14 03:44:36
|
+1 on Jython 3. thanks Anamitra Bhattacharyya Maximo STSM IBM Master Inventor ________________________________ From: Yaqiang Wang <yaq...@gm...> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2023 8:02 PM To: Jeff Allen <ja...@fa...> Cc: jyt...@li... <jyt...@li...> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Jython-users] Jython 3? Jython 3 demand + 1. Regards Yaqiang On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 4: 56 PM Jeff Allen <ja. py@ farowl. co. uk> wrote: Not soon. We can't put a date to it, but we continue to have Jython 3 as a goal. It is good to hear there is still a demand. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender You have not previously corresponded with this sender. <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/PjiDSg!12-vrJA3gVI0Ny5x94Btbklmwjn44fZaF_FPdEgLCAndaDB_wqDxWMfY6-o9MKubYrVogwKMmpBOUJWZVkUg97JuuaWjrXa9VvrWZiaEXX0pTWP8cq1yV5nx2Vnr7uoz$> Report Suspicious ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Jython 3 demand + 1. Regards Yaqiang On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 4:56 PM Jeff Allen <ja...@fa...<mailto:ja...@fa...>> wrote: Not soon. We can't put a date to it, but we continue to have Jython 3 as a goal. It is good to hear there is still a demand. On 07/07/2023 19:53, Shellman, Spencer D. (Contractor) via Jython-users wrote: Hi, Can I expect Jython 3.* anytime soon? This would be extremely useful to me. Thanks. -- Jeff Allen _______________________________________________ Jython-users mailing list Jyt...@li...<mailto:Jyt...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users> -- ************************************************* Dr. Yaqiang Wang Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences (CAMS) 46, Zhong-Guan-Cun South Avenue Beijing, 100081 China yaq...@gm...<mailto:yaq...@gm...> www.meteothink.org<http://www.meteothink.org> ************************************************** |
From: Yaqiang W. <yaq...@gm...> - 2023-07-14 00:02:31
|
Jython 3 demand + 1. Regards Yaqiang On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 4:56 PM Jeff Allen <ja...@fa...> wrote: > Not soon. We can't put a date to it, but we continue to have Jython 3 as a > goal. > > It is good to hear there is still a demand. > On 07/07/2023 19:53, Shellman, Spencer D. (Contractor) via Jython-users > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Can I expect Jython 3.* anytime soon? This would be extremely useful to > me. Thanks. > > -- > > Jeff Allen > > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users > -- ************************************************* Dr. Yaqiang Wang Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences (CAMS) 46, Zhong-Guan-Cun South Avenue Beijing, 100081 China yaq...@gm... www.meteothink.org ************************************************** |
From: Jeff A. <ja...@fa...> - 2023-07-13 08:55:55
|
Not soon. We can't put a date to it, but we continue to have Jython 3 as a goal. It is good to hear there is still a demand. On 07/07/2023 19:53, Shellman, Spencer D. (Contractor) via Jython-users wrote: > > Hi, > > Can I expect Jython 3.* anytime soon? This would be extremely useful > to me. Thanks. > > -- Jeff Allen |
From: Shellman, S. D. (Contractor) <Spe...@un...> - 2023-07-07 19:27:04
|
Hi, Can I expect Jython 3.* anytime soon? This would be extremely useful to me. Thanks. |
From: Juniarti S. <jun...@ya...> - 2023-06-09 02:15:16
|
Hi, When I use jython2.7.2 I am hitting issue #93 <https://github.com/jython/jython/issues/93>. I thought the fix is in jython2.7.3 but even after I am using jython2.7.3 the file permission behavior remains. Is there anything else need to be done to have the file permission working as before jython2.7.2? Here is how to demonstrate the regression issue in jython: Using jython271 Jython 2.7.1 (default:0df7adb1b397, Jun 30 2017, 19:02:43) [OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Red Hat, Inc.)] on java1.8.0_372 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. ">>> import copy" Checking the permission of the newly compile script: [root@juniredhat1 Lib]# ls -la copy* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 28015 Jun 2 09:45 'copy$py.class' ===> NOTED THE FILE PERMISSION THE SAME AS THE SOURCE -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 27996 Jun 30 2017 'copy$py.class.org' -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11519 Jun 30 2017 copy.py -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13490 Jun 2 09:45 'copy_reg$py.class' -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6800 Jun 30 2017 copy_reg.py ========================================================================= Using jython273 Jython 2.7.3 (tags/v2.7.3:5f29801fe, Sep 10 2022, 18:52:49) [OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Red Hat, Inc.)] on java1.8.0_372 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. ">>> import copy" Checking the permission of the newly compile script: -rw------- 1 root root 26875 Jun 2 09:48 'copy$py.class' ===> NOTED THE FILE PERMISSION GOT CHANGE AS ISSUE #93 <https://github.com/jython/jython/issues/93> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26856 Sep 10 2022 'copy$py.class.org' -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11519 Sep 10 2022 copy.py -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12955 Sep 10 2022 'copy_reg$py.class' -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6800 Sep 10 2022 copy_reg.py I opened GitHub issue https://github.com/jython/jython/issues/246 but no one has looked at it. I am hoping, I will get quicker respond from posting it too. Can someone please help on this regression issue as it is breaking our customers? Thank you, Juni. |
From: o lu <olu...@gm...> - 2023-06-05 20:02:59
|
On 6/5/23 04:20, Jeff Allen wrote: > > Jython 2 is built with Java 8 and tested with Java 8 and Java 11. > > The backwards compatibility of Java versions is very high. The byte > code is stable. What varies slightly is the Java API, where methods > may have been removed, or others overloaded in ways that affect > exactly which is found during a call. > > ... > > Jeff > My (2¢) concern would be for newer features in Java like modules and, more recently, Virtual Threads and things of that nature. |
From: Anamitra B. <abh...@us...> - 2023-06-05 12:22:22
|
thanks a lot for all the great info - we will do an end to end test with Jython soon on java 17 - based on our use cases. Will post the results when we get there. thanks Anamitra Bhattacharyya Maximo STSM IBM Master Inventor ________________________________ From: Jeff Allen <ja...@fa...> Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 4:20 AM To: jyt...@li... <jyt...@li...> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Jython-users] Java 17 and support for jython Jython 2 is built with Java 8 and tested with Java 8 and Java 11. The backwards compatibility of Java versions is very high. The byte code is stable. What varies slightly is the Java API, where methods may have been removed, or others overloaded ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender You have not previously corresponded with this sender. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Jython 2 is built with Java 8 and tested with Java 8 and Java 11. The backwards compatibility of Java versions is very high. The byte code is stable. What varies slightly is the Java API, where methods may have been removed, or others overloaded in ways that affect exactly which is found during a call. I ran the regression tests on an installed 2.7.3 with Java 17. The expected result is explained here: https://jython-devguide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/release_jy.html#installation-regrtest<https://jython-devguide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/release_jy.html#installation-regrtest> With Java 17 I got an additional failure from test_httplib that is to do with header data not expected by the test. That may well be satisfactory for your application. You'll do your own tests, of course, and can repeat ours fairly easily. There may be a 2.7.4 this year, and it may be tested with Java 17, but an eventual Jython 3 will get most of the time. Jeff On 04/06/2023 13:24, Oti wrote: It starts: ➜ ~ java -version openjdk version "17.0.7" 2023-04-18 OpenJDK Runtime Environment Temurin-17.0.7+7 (build 17.0.7+7) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Temurin-17.0.7+7 (build 17.0.7+7, mixed mode, sharing) ➜ ~ java -jar ~/Downloads/jython-standalone-2.7.3.jar Jython 2.7.3 (tags/v2.7.3:5f29801fe, Sep 10 2022, 18:52:49) [OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Eclipse Adoptium)] on java17.0.7 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> Best wishes, Oti. On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 10:15 PM Anamitra Bhattacharyya via Jython-users <jyt...@li...<mailto:jyt...@li...>> wrote: havent tested it yet - we were contemplating a move to java 17 - and since the https://www.jython.org/download<https://www.jython.org/download> for 2.7.3 only lists java 8 and 11 - was not sure if there was another version that would be released for java 17. Not sure if anyone here have tried with java 17 - and any issues with jython 2.7.3 on that. Downloads<https://www.jython.org/download> The Python runtime on the JVM www.jython.org<http://www.jython.org> thanks Anamitra Bhattacharyya Maximo STSM IBM Master Inventor ________________________________ From: Chris Clark <Chr...@ac...<mailto:Chr...@ac...>> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 4:00 PM To: Anamitra Bhattacharyya <abh...@us...<mailto:abh...@us...>>; jyt...@li...<mailto:jyt...@li...> <jyt...@li...<mailto:jyt...@li...>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Java 17 and support for jython Are you saying it’s not working? Worth opening a ticket if that’s the case with detailed error/test case. From: Anamitra Bhattacharyya via Jython-users <jython-users@ lists. sourceforge. net><mailto:jython-users@ lists. sourceforge. net> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 11: 50 ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Are you saying it’s not working? Worth opening a ticket if that’s the case with detailed error/test case. From: Anamitra Bhattacharyya via Jython-users <jyt...@li...<mailto:jyt...@li...>> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 11:50 AM To: jyt...@li...<mailto:jyt...@li...> Subject: [Jython-users] Java 17 and support for jython Hi just wondering if jython 273 supports java 17? From the jython.org<http://jython.org> website - its java 8 and java 11 - does not mention java 17. If not - is there a version of jython that is coming up that will support java 17? thanks Anamitra Bhattacharyya Maximo STSM IBM Master Inventor _______________________________________________ Jython-users mailing list Jyt...@li...<mailto:Jyt...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users> _______________________________________________ Jython-users mailing list Jyt...@li...<mailto:Jyt...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users> -- Jeff Allen |
From: Jeff A. <ja...@fa...> - 2023-06-05 08:58:37
|
Jython 2 is built with Java 8 and tested with Java 8 and Java 11. The backwards compatibility of Java versions is very high. The byte code is stable. What varies slightly is the Java API, where methods may have been removed, or others overloaded in ways that affect exactly which is found during a call. I ran the regression tests on an installed 2.7.3 with Java 17. The expected result is explained here: https://jython-devguide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/release_jy.html#installation-regrtest With Java 17 I got an additional failure from test_httplib that is to do with header data not expected by the test. That may well be satisfactory for your application. You'll do your own tests, of course, and can repeat ours fairly easily. There may be a 2.7.4 this year, and it may be tested with Java 17, but an eventual Jython 3 will get most of the time. Jeff On 04/06/2023 13:24, Oti wrote: > It starts: > > *➜**~*java -version > > openjdk version "17.0.7" 2023-04-18 > > OpenJDK Runtime Environment Temurin-17.0.7+7 (build 17.0.7+7) > > OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Temurin-17.0.7+7 (build 17.0.7+7, mixed mode, > sharing) > > *➜**~*java -jar ~/Downloads/jython-standalone-2.7.3.jar > > Jython 2.7.3 (tags/v2.7.3:5f29801fe, Sep 10 2022, 18:52:49) > > [OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Eclipse Adoptium)] on java17.0.7 > > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. > > >>> > > > > Best wishes, > Oti. > > > > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 10:15 PM Anamitra Bhattacharyya via > Jython-users <jyt...@li...> wrote: > > havent tested it yet - we were contemplating a move to java 17 - > and since the https://www.jython.org/download for 2.7.3 only lists > java 8 and 11 - was not sure if there was another version that > would be released for java 17. Not sure if anyone here have tried > with java 17 - and any issues with jython 2.7.3 on that. > Downloads <https://www.jython.org/download> > The Python runtime on the JVM > www.jython.org <http://www.jython.org> > > > > thanks > Anamitra Bhattacharyya > Maximo STSM > IBM Master Inventor > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Chris Clark <Chr...@ac...> > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 31, 2023 4:00 PM > *To:* Anamitra Bhattacharyya <abh...@us...>; > jyt...@li... > <jyt...@li...> > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] RE: Java 17 and support for jython > Are you saying it’s not working? Worth opening a ticket if that’s > the case with detailed error/test case. From: Anamitra > Bhattacharyya via Jython-users > <jython-users@ lists. sourceforge. net> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, > 2023 11: 50 > ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart > This Message Is From an External Sender > This message came from outside your organization. > ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd > > Are you saying it’s not working? Worth opening a ticket if that’s > the case with detailed error/test case. > > *From:* Anamitra Bhattacharyya via Jython-users > <jyt...@li...> > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 31, 2023 11:50 AM > *To:* jyt...@li... > *Subject:* [Jython-users] Java 17 and support for jython > > Hi > > just wondering if jython 273 supports java 17? From the jython.org > <http://jython.org> website - its java 8 and java 11 - does not > mention java 17. If not - is there a version of jython that is > coming up that will support java 17? > > thanks > > Anamitra Bhattacharyya > > Maximo STSM > > IBM Master Inventor > > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users -- Jeff Allen |
From: Oti <oh...@gm...> - 2023-06-04 12:24:57
|
It starts: *➜ **~* java -version openjdk version "17.0.7" 2023-04-18 OpenJDK Runtime Environment Temurin-17.0.7+7 (build 17.0.7+7) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Temurin-17.0.7+7 (build 17.0.7+7, mixed mode, sharing) *➜ **~* java -jar ~/Downloads/jython-standalone-2.7.3.jar Jython 2.7.3 (tags/v2.7.3:5f29801fe, Sep 10 2022, 18:52:49) [OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Eclipse Adoptium)] on java17.0.7 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> Best wishes, Oti. On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 10:15 PM Anamitra Bhattacharyya via Jython-users < jyt...@li...> wrote: > havent tested it yet - we were contemplating a move to java 17 - and since > the https://www.jython.org/download for 2.7.3 only lists java 8 and 11 - > was not sure if there was another version that would be released for java > 17. Not sure if anyone here have tried with java 17 - and any issues with > jython 2.7.3 on that. > Downloads <https://www.jython.org/download> > The Python runtime on the JVM > www.jython.org > > > thanks > Anamitra Bhattacharyya > Maximo STSM > IBM Master Inventor > ------------------------------ > *From:* Chris Clark <Chr...@ac...> > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 31, 2023 4:00 PM > *To:* Anamitra Bhattacharyya <abh...@us...>; > jyt...@li... <jyt...@li...> > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] RE: Java 17 and support for jython > > Are you saying it’s not working? Worth opening a ticket if that’s the case > with detailed error/test case. From: Anamitra Bhattacharyya via > Jython-users <jython-users@ lists. sourceforge. net> Sent: Wednesday, May > 31, 2023 11: 50 > ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart > This Message Is From an External Sender > This message came from outside your organization. > > ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd > > Are you saying it’s not working? Worth opening a ticket if that’s the case > with detailed error/test case. > > > > *From:* Anamitra Bhattacharyya via Jython-users < > jyt...@li...> > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 31, 2023 11:50 AM > *To:* jyt...@li... > *Subject:* [Jython-users] Java 17 and support for jython > > > > Hi > > just wondering if jython 273 supports java 17? From the jython.org > website - its java 8 and java 11 - does not mention java 17. If not - is > there a version of jython that is coming up that will support java 17? > > > > thanks > > Anamitra Bhattacharyya > > Maximo STSM > > IBM Master Inventor > _______________________________________________ > Jython-users mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users > |
From: Chris C. <Chr...@ac...> - 2023-05-31 20:17:11
|
Are you saying it's not working? Worth opening a ticket if that's the case with detailed error/test case. From: Anamitra Bhattacharyya via Jython-users <jyt...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 11:50 AM To: jyt...@li... Subject: [Jython-users] Java 17 and support for jython Hi just wondering if jython 273 supports java 17? From the jython.org website - its java 8 and java 11 - does not mention java 17. If not - is there a version of jython that is coming up that will support java 17? thanks Anamitra Bhattacharyya Maximo STSM IBM Master Inventor |
From: Anamitra B. <abh...@us...> - 2023-05-31 20:14:20
|
havent tested it yet - we were contemplating a move to java 17 - and since the https://www.jython.org/download for 2.7.3 only lists java 8 and 11 - was not sure if there was another version that would be released for java 17. Not sure if anyone here have tried with java 17 - and any issues with jython 2.7.3 on that. Downloads<https://www.jython.org/download> The Python runtime on the JVM www.jython.org thanks Anamitra Bhattacharyya Maximo STSM IBM Master Inventor ________________________________ From: Chris Clark <Chr...@ac...> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 4:00 PM To: Anamitra Bhattacharyya <abh...@us...>; jyt...@li... <jyt...@li...> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Java 17 and support for jython Are you saying it’s not working? Worth opening a ticket if that’s the case with detailed error/test case. From: Anamitra Bhattacharyya via Jython-users <jython-users@ lists. sourceforge. net> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 11: 50 ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Are you saying it’s not working? Worth opening a ticket if that’s the case with detailed error/test case. From: Anamitra Bhattacharyya via Jython-users <jyt...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 11:50 AM To: jyt...@li... Subject: [Jython-users] Java 17 and support for jython Hi just wondering if jython 273 supports java 17? From the jython.org website - its java 8 and java 11 - does not mention java 17. If not - is there a version of jython that is coming up that will support java 17? thanks Anamitra Bhattacharyya Maximo STSM IBM Master Inventor |
From: Anamitra B. <abh...@us...> - 2023-05-31 18:50:26
|
Hi just wondering if jython 273 supports java 17? From the jython.org website - its java 8 and java 11 - does not mention java 17. If not - is there a version of jython that is coming up that will support java 17? thanks Anamitra Bhattacharyya Maximo STSM IBM Master Inventor |
From: Jeff A. <ja...@fa...> - 2022-09-14 07:36:31
|
The Jython Project is pleased to announce the general availability of Jython 2.7.3 at Sonatype. (https://search.maven.org/search?q=g:org.python) This is a maintenance release that incorporates a number of bug-fixes, some kindly offered as PRs by users. It is identical to the recent release candidate (rc1) of about 2 weeks ago. Please report problems on the issue tracker (https://github.com/jython/jython/issues). We are no longer inviting bugs at bugs.jython.org, which in due course will become read-only (as its python.org equivalent did this year). Bugs on the old tracker, whilst not entirely ignored, will not be migrated en masse to GitHub: if you care about one particularly, it would help us if you could raise it on GitHub, with a link to the b.j.o. entry. Jeff -- Jeff Allen _______________________________________________ Jython-dev mailing list Jyt...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev |