From: Finn B. <bc...@wo...> - 2002-05-31 14:08:50
|
[Dinu Gherman] > Ok, that explains a few things. I can see archived messages talking > about it, but I don't see anything on jython.org that would explain > which parts of PyXML 0.6.6 were ported. Is that so or should I re- > fine my algorithm? I copied the parts of PyXML that was needed to complete some of the PyXML test cases. Please note that I didn't port anything, I only copied some of the files. The drivers that depends on C code such as expat isn't included. If I included all of PyXML some tests failed. > I remember there used to be quite some interaction issues with 4Suite > packages and versions needed to make XSLT fly, etc. Considering my > own experience only, I feel like the boundaries between std.lib. XML, > PyXML and 4Suite are too blurred, but maybe that's only my subjective > impression. > > So, I admit, when reading "selected parts" above I feel rather more > uneasy about it. ;-) I understand. By removing the ./Lib/xml directory, you are right back to what jython itself supports of xml: absolutely nothing at all. So while I too think that the internal boundries between the PyXML parts are blurred, there is no blurring between jython and PyXML. If you can create a subset of PyXML that works better with jython, please do so and report you findings to jython-dev. I'll be happy to include more or less of PyXML if it helps. regards, finn |