From: L. H. <hu...@ha...> - 2001-01-13 13:23:48
|
Finn Bock wrote: >> HP: >> >> JPython 1.1+09 on java1.2.2.05 (JIT: null) >> 86.5 <-- interpretted, very slow >> >> JPython 1.1+09 on java1.2.2.05 (JIT: HP) >> 11.8 <-- classic JIT >> >> JPython 1.1+09 on java1.2.2.05 (JIT: null) >> 14.9 <-- HotSpot JIT > > > My numbers are on Win2k & JDK1.3 & 300Mhz P3: > > Jython 2.0beta2 on java1.3.0 (JIT: null) > 37.74500000476837 <-- interpretted > > Jython 2.0beta2 on java1.3.0 (JIT: null) > 4.736999988555908 <-- hotspot > > While somewhat faster then your HP it is in the within the same range. > > >> Linux 512 MHz dual Celeron (brain dead?) Pentium >> >> Linux: /home/mudd[1] jpython >> JPython 1.1 on java1.2.2-RC2 (JIT: javacomp) >> Copyright (C) 1997-1999 Corporation for National Research Initiatives >> >>>>> from time import time >>>>> t1=time(); x=2L**10000; delay=time()-t1; print delay >>>> >> 0.00499 <-- About 2,400 times faster than HP's best numbers??!? >> > > That's fast! Does it actually calculate the correct value? I checked it out on my Machine: /home/humbert > cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 5 model : 9 model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D+ Processor stepping : 1 cpu MHz : 400.917224 cache size : 256 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no sep_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mmx 3dnow bogomips : 799.54 humbert@haspe:~/jython-2.0b2 > ./jython Jython 2.0beta2 on java1.3.0_01 (JIT: null) Type "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> from time import time >>> t1=time(); x=2L**10000; delay=time()-t1; print delay 4.932000041007996 >>> TNX Ludger |