|
From: <bc...@wo...> - 2001-07-15 11:28:15
|
[Samuele] >[a patch] >plus an empty org.python.util.PyMetaClass interface >could make into the code, no problem with that. > >I can play the good guy <wink> and if it's OK for Finn, it can be committed. I haven't tested it, but if Samuele's patch would work for you Phillip, then I see no problem in adding it. But ... >The whole point is that the patch will last until 2.2 and maybe survive to >that. Exactly! If this change turns out to interact poorly with the up-comming 2.2 "descr" change it might be removed again. So for the moment the PyMetaClass hook should be considered an experimental feature. OTOH, if you can deliver an ExtensionClass compatible module, then it is an excellent argument in favor of keeping the proposed PyMetaClass hook. regards, finn |