From: <fwi...@gm...> - 2017-11-22 19:42:54
|
A new year's 2.7.2 with a limited scope is definitely a great idea, as is an updated GitHub based website. I'm on board! -Frank On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Jeff Allen <ja...@fa...> wrote: > All: > > How about it? This seems like a reasonable interval since 2.7.1. > > Frank/Jim: would you care to set a goal? What else ought we to have in that > release? > > I think we should mean by the answer, what we'd like to see in 2.7.2b1. Then > we only take on fixes during beta we didn't foresee or can't avoid. That > way, we hopefully don't stay in beta very long. I'm extrapolating a bit from > https://github.com/jython/devguide/blob/jython/devcycle.rst#stages (cloned > from CPython) but it seems a good discipline to prevent late de-stabilising > change. > > Is it perhaps as important to create a revised web site to back the release? > (We have talked about a site we can all contribute to via GitHub.) > > Also, I've been meaning to ask, the current dev tip should identify as > "2.7.1+" (not plain "2.7.1") shouldn't it? And 2.7.2a1 then 2.7.2a1+ as soon > as we decide we're having a 2.7.2? I think I see how this works in > build.xml. > > Jeff > > -- > Jeff Allen > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Jython-dev mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev |