From: Charlie G. <cha...@gm...> - 2009-10-02 18:54:56
|
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Frank Wierzbicki <fwi...@gm...> wrote: > The point is that they are easy to apply consistently, you don't need > to choose between adding a constant to ClassConstants.java or spelling > out the particular string representation of the class you are on. > > What do you think? Will this cause any trouble for those of you doing > compiler work? I like anything that gets these to be consistent, and this seems like a decent enough convention, so I say go for it. Charlie |