Re: [Jython-dev] Jython and Roundup

[Frank W. <fwi...@gm...>]

On Feb 3, 2008 4:10 PM, Charlie Groves <cha...@gm...> wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 2008 10:26 AM, Frank Wierzbicki <fwi...@gm...> wrote:
> > I just asked the Python folks if we could get a roundup instance for
> > Jython.  I don't like the sf bug tracker very much, and I think we'd
> > have an easier time following Python's lead in this area.  They are
> > willing to do this for us.  Any objections?
>
> +1 from me as long as I can keep getting an email every time an issue
> changes.  I have a few questions about the migration:
I believe this is the case.  The discussion is here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tracker-discuss/2008-February/001395.html

> * Does the sf to roundup migrator assign the roundup issue id from the
> sf aid so jython.org/bugs/<id> and jython.org/patches/<id> links could
> continue to work?
> * Are we stuck with the sourceforge issue schema for new issues?  I'd
> like to drop the priority field and combine the status and resolution
> fields, but those would have to exist for issues migrated in.
Looks like they do some kind of merging.  It also sounds like we could
specify some of these things from the discussion linked above.

> * Can we drop fields from the CPython tracker schema?  I'd rather not
> do issue dependency or superseder tracking explicitly in the bug
> tracker.
I think we have some flexibility with issues like this.

-Frank