From: Robert <ca...@li...> - 2004-08-25 03:22:43
|
Could Jython files have a ".jy" suffix instead of ".py"? Or is Jython sufficiently like Python code that it doesn't matter? Robert |
From: Diez B. R. <de...@we...> - 2004-09-08 10:00:37
|
Am Mittwoch, 25. August 2004 05:23 schrieb Robert: > Could Jython files have a ".jy" suffix instead of ".py"? Or is Jython > sufficiently like Python code that it doesn't matter? You can name them as you like - if it helps you. The extension is only needed on windows for file-type distinction, and I think it shouldn't be too hard to register .jy to the jython interpreter. The thing is that usually jython comes into play when the interoperability between java and jython is needed - e.g. in your oracle-related question. But that mostly involves having a customized classpath. So I usually end up with some customized shell script lying in the root dir of my current project that gathers all necessary jars. So there is not much sense in registering a file-type here. Diez |