Re: [Jwma-users] jwma & jboss: Stall deploying i18n ?!?

[Dieter W. <di...@wi...>]

Joao, (now what is really the way you like to be addressed?)

>> This is supposed to be a feature, not an issue. When the logging is prepared
>> jwma will use the configuration given by log4j.properties
> 
> ?Hum? you mean it SHOULD redirect *ALL* the logging, and not only the
> logging from jwma? What happens now is that all JBoss's logs gets
> recorded ONLY into jwma.log file.

This sounds rather bad. Looks like your setup does not properly "isolate"
the web application with it's own loader.
Obviously I am configuring classes loaded into the container (log4j in this
case), instead of those supposed to be loaded for the webapp (from the lib
dir).

> I have a empty claspath. Jboss sets the classpath it need in a wrapper
> script, if I'm not mistaken.
> For what I understood, it seems JBoss should be loading the xercer.jar
> file (thats the one with XMLSerializer) but it isn't. I'll try to mess
> around with the classpath and continue this thread on JBoss-User mailing
> list.
Basically the container should load the webapp with a separate class loader,
with everything that is in WEB-INF/lib and WEB-INF/classes (of the webapp).
This isolation is necessary to prevent conflicts between installed web
applications).
Your setup obviously fails to do this (or is not configured properly).

> But, just for my info, is there some place inside web.xml or other
> descriptor where there is need to says "I am using these libs, that are
> placed in ..." ? I see they are placed under /WEB-INF/lib, but I don't
> know if this is something standartized or not..
The WEB-INF/lib and WEB-INF/classes are standardized by the specification.


> Thank you for all the help.
You are welcome.


If you want evaluate jwma, I would suggest you to deploy it standalone in a
supported container (see How-To's http://jwma.sourceforge.net/deployment).
This _should_ work, and give you the chance to figure out, whether jwma is
what you really want.

Reagrds,
Dieter