Menu

#42 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE LONG S H should be on U+EBA1

v1.0_(example)
closed-fixed
None
5
2018-06-25
2018-06-21
No

Could you plase check the positioning of the LATIN SMALL LIGATURE LONG S H of the regular style?
According to the MUFI recommendation (and the UNZ 1 coding), it should be placed on codepoint U+EBA1. This was the case in older versions and it is also displayed correctly in the italics style.
But in v1.0, regular style, it is placed on codepoint U+E1A7 instead, and on U+EBA1 a second version of LATIN SMALL LIGATURE LONG S LONG S I can be found, in addition to the one on U+EBA7.
The glyph is also displayed wrong on the MUFI website, but entity and description are correct there and are the same as in the UNZ 1 coding. It would be great, if the compatiblility with other typefaces including fraktur could be kept, where LATIN SMALL LIGATURE LONG S H is on U+EBA1, when they follow MUFI or UNZ 1.

Discussion

  • Peter Baker

    Peter Baker - 2018-06-21

    I'll have a look at this and put out a corrected version ASAP.

     
    • Holger H. Bekemeier

      Many thanks.

       
  • Peter Baker

    Peter Baker - 2018-06-25

    This is fixed, and a new version will be posted momentarily.

     
  • Peter Baker

    Peter Baker - 2018-06-25
    • status: open --> closed-fixed
    • assigned_to: Peter Baker
     
    • Holger H. Bekemeier

      Thank you again; it works perfectly now.

       

Log in to post a comment.