Re: JudySL with 64-bit pointers as values

[Tim M. <tma...@ne...>]

On 10/23/2012 8:44 PM, Alan Silverstein wrote:
> Tim et al,
>> But I'll be more comfortable ensuring that every variable is the same
>> size as when Judy was being designed & tested--unless Doug or Alan
>> remember the nitty-gritties well enough to express confidence that
>> leaving the signed ints as 32-bit shouldn't be a problem.
> Sorry, no recollection at all!  Other than Windows wasn't well tested
> and things might have changed.
>
> Alan
No worries, Doug already answered--it's safe to leave those "long" 
variables as 32-bit even in 64-bit.  (By his coding practice, if the 
precise size had mattered he would have used a typedef instead a native 
C type.)  So the Word_t typedef is the only one I need to worry about 
functioning differently in Windows.


Tim