From: Jon S. B. <jon...@co...> - 2010-10-10 14:21:24
|
> I'll take a different stab: while there are two independent variables > (alpha and flap position) given, this is only a one dimensional (i.e. > one input) table! So the table is being read in (somehow) as a 2D > table and then going nuts from there. > > Commenting out the flap position independent variable lets the check > progress to the error Ron found. Correcting that one as I suggested > sends us to the next error, CDDe which is truly not monotonically > increasing: > > Note: It doesn't look like Andreas monotonicity check is incorrect > after all. Only that the data provided wasn't sufficient and things > went bad after that. Maybe it points to a need for a check to ensure > at least three columns of data when there are two independent > variables. > > Patch for SGS.xml is attached. > > Dennis Good catch, Dennis - and, yes, there should be another check to make sure the data and table definition agree. This is a larger discussion than I have time for this morning. Can someone summarize it? Is there anything other than a data point change and sanity check on the table that needs to be added? Jon |