|
From: Curtis O. <cur...@gm...> - 2007-12-29 15:16:05
|
On Dec 29, 2007 9:08 AM, David Culp <dav...@co...> wrote: > Actually it might be best to include a speed freeze along with the above > "full > freeze". Without this the model will be allowed to speed up or slow down. > For a true "wind tunnel effect" the speed will need to be held constant > until > the user "dials in" a new one. > The other one that I think is useful from a simulation standpoint is "fuel freeze". The benefit is that in a training scenario, you can concentrate on your training tasks without needing to add the complexity of fuel management. And for wind tunnel type testing, this would eliminate a potential source of weight/balance change that could skew your data. And it's also nice from a simulator testing or playing standpoint. If you want to do an around the world flight, or leave the airplane on autopilot while you go sleep for a while, it's nice to know that you aren't going to run out of fuel and be a lawn dart when you return to the computer. Curt. -- Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/ Unique text: 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d |