|
From: Jon B. <js...@ha...> - 2004-10-13 12:31:18
|
[... encyclopedic information snipped ...] Ron: When I see an email from you has come through, I can't help but think: time to drink from the firehose again. :-) Thanks for all the info. > Note: few C172's hit the maximum poh speeds. A more realistic model > might be based on 5 kts slower maximum TAS. > > I have scans of at least one C172 PoH. Is it emailable? PDF format? I'd like to see that. Do you have any suggestions on an approach for initial validation of our C-172 model? Any comments at all? I haven't thought about this much, but I might give some thought to formal approach at this, which really hasn't been addressed yet. My background has included some validation of military and space vehicle simulations, so this does interest me, and I'd be interested in more discussion. Jon |