|
From: Jon S B. <js...@ha...> - 2004-10-12 15:19:30
|
Last night I did some performance analysis on the C-172 (using the C-172x config file, because I can do scripted testing with that one using the autopilot capability). There have been valid questions raised about the performance and dynamics of the C-172 model. Several people have noticed seemingly too high engine RPM, too fast flight, etc. [ !!NOTE!! : the C-172x is essentially the C-172R aircraft with a test autopilot - the C-172P model features several differences which I have not yet figured out. I consider the C-172P model currently to be questionable.] One thing that must be stressed, though, is to make sure that the same model aircraft with the same selected engine is being chosen when making comparisons. The JSBSim C-172R uses the Textron Lycoming IO-360-L2A engine, which produces 160 BHP at 2,400 RPM (directly from the Cessna web site). One test that I ran was a takeoff performance test to see how little room is needed for takeoff. I set up a test with the throttle at full, and the mixture set to 85%. There were no winds, and the runway was at sea level. I got this: Takeoff roll: 886 ft (270 meters) Over 50' obstacle: 1664 ft. (507 meters) The Cessna web site specifies this: Takeoff roll: 945 ft (288 meters) Over 50' obstacle: 1685 ft. (514 meters) As you can see, the comparison seems pretty good - the takeoff roll over a 50 ft obstacle agrees to within 1.5%. I'll do further testing this evening. Comments invited. Jon |