From: David P G. <gr...@us...> - 2007-06-25 17:51:56
|
jik...@li... wrote on 06/25/2007 01:19:35 PM: > <snip> > various ways to report violation > </snip> all ok with me. I'd bias towards making it a more fatal error by default, but I know sometimes that can be annoying for debugging. > 5) "fix" the compilers so that we don't generate warnings. For example, > provide uninterruptible versions of new. There's probably a limit of how > much of this can happen. I think we'd actually have to do real work to enable any more cases and all the low-hanging fruit has been done already. I suspect there's very little additional cases we could cover. Uninterruptible is a very strong property: it is effectively an atomic section from the view of M-N threading and what happens on a single virtual processor. --dave |