From: Eliot M. <mo...@cs...> - 2003-06-26 23:54:24
|
>>>>> "David" == David P Grove <gr...@us...> writes: David> We left it as an int[] intentionally. It should be an int[]. David> It is NOT a VM_WordArray. For the same reason the jtoc remains David> an int[]. I guess I (for one) need more explanation. I agree that the jtoc can/should be an int[], since many of its elements require only word alignment, and we can simply leave gaps (or, more cleverly, fill them in with 32-bit items, if we like) when we force alignment on 64-bit items. But I don't see that logic for the stacks. -- Eliot |