From: Gabriel C. de B. <aut...@uo...> - 2004-11-30 17:00:19
|
this seems inconsistent to me. I think that the "find next" should be about the last search executed. So it's at 2x1. anyone else? Gabriel -----Original Message----- From: Chris Petersen [mailto:li...@fo...] Robert William Vesterman wrote: > 3. Hit "escape", to get out of the dialog, without having actually searched > for "y" or anything. > 4. Select "Search/Find Next". > > You will find the next "y", not the next "x". this is because esc is mapped to "close" because there is no "cancel" in the find dialog. -Chris |
From: Nathan T. <eu...@ya...> - 2004-11-30 18:09:42
|
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 02:58:31PM -0200, Gabriel Cosentino de Barros wrote: > this seems inconsistent to me. > > I think that the "find next" should be about the last search executed. > > So it's at 2x1. anyone else? I don't think that Chris was saying that it was the desired behaviour, only stating the reason for the behaviour. I for one agree with Gabriel. Close shouldn't change the state of the search. The other 3 buttons in the dialog should. -- IANAL -- But I play one on /. ---------------------------------- Nathan Tenney Alumni Utah State University eu...@ya... ---------------------------------- |
From: Chris P. <li...@fo...> - 2004-11-30 18:32:14
|
> I don't think that Chris was saying that it was the desired > behaviour, only stating the reason for the behaviour. I for one > agree with Gabriel. Close shouldn't change the state of the search. > The other 3 buttons in the dialog should. Agreed. I'm personally fond of "Cancel" and "Don't Find" (two buttons, one clearly cancels, throwing away any changes, and the other merely closes the window, but keeps the settings -- I do use this kind of thing occasionally). But there are a lot of other things I'd change about the find/replace dialog before that (for a few: the focus issues in 4.2, turning the text boxes into multi-line boxes so I can find/replace \n, a saved "bookmark" list of find/replace PAIRS) -Chris |
From: Robert W. V. <bob...@ve...> - 2004-11-30 20:12:30
|
"So it's at 2x1. anyone else?" I didn't take Chris' message to mean that he was against fixing it - I just took it to mean that he was explaining why it was happening. Anyway, my opinion is that regardless of why it's happening, it should be fixed. -----Original Message----- From: jed...@li... [mailto:jed...@li...]On Behalf Of Gabriel Cosentino de Barros Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 11:59 AM To: jedit-users Subject: RE: [ jEdit-users ] search/find next bug this seems inconsistent to me. I think that the "find next" should be about the last search executed. So it's at 2x1. anyone else? Gabriel -----Original Message----- From: Chris Petersen [mailto:li...@fo...] Robert William Vesterman wrote: > 3. Hit "escape", to get out of the dialog, without having actually searched > for "y" or anything. > 4. Select "Search/Find Next". > > You will find the next "y", not the next "x". this is because esc is mapped to "close" because there is no "cancel" in the find dialog. -Chris |