From: Cees de G. <cde...@gm...> - 2007-02-16 16:28:23
|
On 2/16/07, Shevek <sh...@an...> wrote: > We have some issues with jdbm which we have solved by writing new > components. However, we have identified a number of requirements for a > longer term solution, and jdbm does not currently satisfy many of these > requirements. We will contribute our current code as soon as I get it > past the legal people. [...wishlist snipped..] Well - send patches this way :). I have committed to one (still-to-be-anonymous-party) to possibly do some work around performance, waiting to see what they and I will do, but apart from that, 1.1 will be a patch-collecting release so I hope that you won't be too disappointed if I ask you to send me code instead of wishes :) OBTW - important matter - I'd like to add type specifications to the various now-generic classes, essentially breaking compatibility with older JDK's. Is that a problem to someone? It's not a big deal but I would like to clean up the code to be compliant with the current state of affairs in Java land :) |