From: Jason D. <ja...@pl...> - 2006-07-22 19:47:01
|
My plat for the initial POC was to use a file outside of the =20 database, using either the pk as you mentioned, or something else =20 that is unique and perhaps shorter. --jason On Jul 22, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Trygve Laugst=F8l wrote: > Bryan Thompson wrote: >> One other thing. Jdbm uses serializers to transform objects into =20 >> byte[]s. >> This works great for many record oriented applications. However, =20 >> I presume >> that you will be storing moderately large files, e.g, up to a few =20 >> megabytes >> for larger maven dependencies. As things stand, you will have to =20 >> have those >> files in memory when they are serialized (using a NOP =20 >> serialization since I >> presume that they will already be represented as a byte[]). > > For this particular use-case (and most other use cases where people =20= > want > to store file data in databases) I would recommend storing the file > content outside of the database itself using the primary key as the > filename + ".data" or something similar. > > -- > Trygve > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------=20= > --- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to =20 > share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn =20 > cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?=20 > page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3DDEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Jdbm-general mailing list > Jdb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdbm-general |